1997
DOI: 10.1007/pl00006200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of donor splice sites in different eukaryotic organisms

Abstract: We present here a new algorithm for functional site analysis. It is based on four main assumptions: each variation of nucleotide composition makes a different contribution to the overall binding free energy of interaction between a functional site and another molecule; nonfunctioning site-like regions (pseudosites) are absent or rare in genomes; there may be errors in the sample of sites; and nucleotides of different site positions are considered to be mutually dependent. In this algorithm, the site set is div… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
99
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(100 reference statements)
2
99
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Haplotype data suggest that this mutation, like the FGA EX2_EX6 11-kb deletion, is also recurrent, or a very ancient mutation since the c.51011G4T mutation is found on multiple discrete haplotypes. Computer splice prediction analysis [Rogozin and Milanesi, 1997] of the region around the IVS4 donor site detected, in the normal sequence, two distinct donor sites, the physiological one and a second four bases downstream. The c.51011G4T mutation abolishes the normal donor site and in consequence, the c.5101 1G4T mutation was predicted to lead to aberrant usage of the alternative donor site, and a consequent 4-bp frameshift mutation in the majority of transcripts.…”
Section: Splice-site Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haplotype data suggest that this mutation, like the FGA EX2_EX6 11-kb deletion, is also recurrent, or a very ancient mutation since the c.51011G4T mutation is found on multiple discrete haplotypes. Computer splice prediction analysis [Rogozin and Milanesi, 1997] of the region around the IVS4 donor site detected, in the normal sequence, two distinct donor sites, the physiological one and a second four bases downstream. The c.51011G4T mutation abolishes the normal donor site and in consequence, the c.5101 1G4T mutation was predicted to lead to aberrant usage of the alternative donor site, and a consequent 4-bp frameshift mutation in the majority of transcripts.…”
Section: Splice-site Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA/protein sequence databases were searched using the BLAST algorithm (Altschul et al, 1990) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (Bethesda, MD), which was accessed via the World Wide Web. Nucleic acid sequences also were analyzed for the presence of introns with SpliceView (Rogozin and Milanesi, 1997) for the prediction of TATA signals with the HCtata algorithm and for poly(A) signals with the HCpolya algorithm (Milanesi et al, 1996), all of which are available at the WebGene server of the Istituto Tecnologie Biomediche Avanzate (Segrate, Italy). The promoter sequence was dissected using the MatInspector algorithm (Quandt et al, 1995) accessed at the Forshungszentrum fĂźr Umwelt und Gesundheit (Neuherberg, Germany).…”
Section: Dna Isolation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The g.4426A>G substitution was particularly interesting as it occurs in the coding region of exon 6 and, as it did not disrupt the reading frame or change codon usage (p.R211R: AGA>AGG), it may have been normally considered as a neutral polymorphism. Therefore, in order to clarify the potential significance of these changes we used several splice-prediction programs based on the search for potential SR binding sequences in the case of ESEfinder (Cartegni et al, 2003), general enhancer sequences in the case of RESCUE-ESE (Fairbrother et al, 2004), or programs such as NNSPLICE (Reese et al, 1997), MaxEntscan and Spliceview (Rogozin and Milanesi, 1997) which evaluate 5' splice site and 3' splice site signal strengths. The results, shown in Table 1, demonstrate that these two mutations do not seem to affect significantly SR protein binding regions (as only minor variations were detected) and that no changes in splicing-affecting sequences could be detected by Rescue-ESE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%