2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of DNA replication profiles in budding yeast and mammalian cells using DNA combing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA combing was performed as described (72). BrdU was detected with a rat monoclonal antibody (AbCys; clone BU1/75) and goat anti-rat coupled to Alexa 488 (Invitrogen).…”
Section: Analysis Of Mcm4 Phosphorylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA combing was performed as described (72). BrdU was detected with a rat monoclonal antibody (AbCys; clone BU1/75) and goat anti-rat coupled to Alexa 488 (Invitrogen).…”
Section: Analysis Of Mcm4 Phosphorylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA combing was performed as described (Bianco et al 2012) using a mouse monoclonal anti-ssDNA (Chemicon, and a rat monoclonal anti-BrdU (Abcys, clone BU1/75). Images were recorded on a Leica DM6000 microscope equipped with a CoolSNAP HQ CCD camera (Roper Scientific) and were processed as described (Bianco et al 2012).…”
Section: Dna Combingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were recorded on a Leica DM6000 microscope equipped with a CoolSNAP HQ CCD camera (Roper Scientific) and were processed as described (Bianco et al 2012).…”
Section: Dna Combingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is suitable for measuring replication fork rates and replication origin usage. The protocol (Steps 23-66) is adapted from the procedures of the Schwob and Pasero laboratories (Lengronne et al 2001;Versini et al 2003;Schwob et al 2009;Bianco et al 2012). It is also amenable to more complicated double-labeling procedures involving the sequential addition of IdU and CldU to measure replication fork stalling and fork asymmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%