2009
DOI: 10.1128/jb.00193-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of DNA Binding by a Eubacterial Zinc Finger Transcription Factor

Abstract: The Serratia marcescens NucC protein is structurally and functionally homologous to the P2 Ogr family of eubacterial zinc finger transcription factors required for late gene expression in P2-and P4-related bacteriophages. These activators exhibit site-specific binding to a conserved DNA sequence, TGT-N 3 -R-N 4 -Y-N 3 -aCA, that is located upstream of NucC-dependent S. marcescens promoters and the late promoters of P2-related phages. In this report we describe the interactions of NucC with the P2 FETUD late op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substitution of thymine for uracil in transcription factor binding sites has been shown to modify transcription factor binding in vitro (79,80) (Table 3). Substitution of a T:A pair with a U:A pair in the cAMP response element (CRE) decreases binding of cAMP response element binding protein (CBP) in vitro, while substitution of C:G with a U:G pair increases binding affinity for CBP (80).…”
Section: Uracil Alters Transcription Factor Binding In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Substitution of thymine for uracil in transcription factor binding sites has been shown to modify transcription factor binding in vitro (79,80) (Table 3). Substitution of a T:A pair with a U:A pair in the cAMP response element (CRE) decreases binding of cAMP response element binding protein (CBP) in vitro, while substitution of C:G with a U:G pair increases binding affinity for CBP (80).…”
Section: Uracil Alters Transcription Factor Binding In Vitromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still unclear whether or not uracil in DNA, or its excision, induce meaningful changes in gene expression. In vitro transcription factor binding studies have revealed changes in binding capacity following uracil substitution (79,80), but in vivo studies are required.…”
Section: Uracil In Dna As a Biochemical Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%