2008
DOI: 10.12702/1984-7033.v08n01a07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of direct and indirect selection and indices in soybean segregating populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the same result was reported when using families of other crops such as popcorn (Amaral Junior et al 2010) and wheat (Cargnin et al 2007). Moreover, Costa et al (2008) reported high genetic gains by selection index in 32 soybean families using SD as economic weight.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Likewise, the same result was reported when using families of other crops such as popcorn (Amaral Junior et al 2010) and wheat (Cargnin et al 2007). Moreover, Costa et al (2008) reported high genetic gains by selection index in 32 soybean families using SD as economic weight.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Selection-based index is another approach, certainly complex, but can avoid the limits of the single-trait selection, particularly the undesirable between-trait relations that present an additional nuisance in breeders' work [11]. Selection-based index approach targets the simultaneous improvement of several traits at the same time, including the grain yield [12,13]. The indices allow the use of a single value in the selection process, since the analysis is carried out by means of linear combinations of phenotypic data of different traits of agronomic interest with the genetic properties of a population [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study on S1 families of sweet corn, Entringer et al (2016) found higher coincidence between Pesek-Baker (1969) and restricted maximum likelihood/best linear unbiased prediction (REML/BLUP) indices (0.75) compared with Smith-Hazel and REML/BLUP (0.70) in terms of 20 superior progenies selected when six traits were simultaneously were selected. The results obtained by Costa et al (2008) indicated that the use of the Smith-Hazel and Pesek-Baker indices was advantageous over direct selection for grain yield in soybean, since the gains were distributed among all traits and classical index of Smith-Hazel had a slight advantage over Pesek-Baker. The relative efficiency of index selection depends upon the estimate of heritability and genetic and phenotypic correlations between traits (Lin 1978). Estimated repeatability indicated that grain yield had low heritability compared to other traits i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Index selection is one of the fundamental methods for the genetic improvement of traits in crop plants. A theory which introduced independently by Smith (1936) in plants and Hazel (1943) in animals is now known as Smith-Hazel index and has been demonstrated to be more reliable than independent culling levels (ICL) and tandem selection (TS) methods in terms of maximizing genetic gain in a crop population (Cotterill 1985;Costa et al 2008). Hazel and Lush (1942) showed that this approach is the most effective as compared with ICL and TS selection methods for independent traits while having at least the same efficiency in the case of correlated traits (Young 1961).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%