Analysis of Digital Governance Transition in South Korea: Focusing on the Leadership of the President for Government Innovation

Abstract

This research intends to draw implications for digital governance establishment by analyzing how the president’s leadership has worked in the digital government innovation promoted in South Korea over the past 30 years. This research examines the process of digital government development in South Korea from the 1990s onwards, chronologically and in the order of presidential administrations. The analysis proceeds from the following three perspectives: the political characteristics of digital government, the presidents’ leadership on government innovation through digital government process, and the composition of a strong cross and joint governmental promotion system. The implementation of digital government is not simply about a computerized government. Driving digital government means the overall transformation of government. From this point of view, to successfully implement digital governance, we must approach it from a highly political perspective. The implementation of digital government in South Korea has been continuously pursued as a national agenda. Since South Korea has a well-established high-speed information and communication infrastructure, e-Government and digital government innovation have been promoted as national agendas regardless of regime change. However, in this process, the president’s leadership determined the success or failure of digital government innovation. Therefore, the most important success factor for digital government innovation is securing policy sustainability regardless of administration change.

Analyzing Trends in Digital Transformation Korean Social Media Data: A Semantic Network Analysis

“…For instance, Korea's collectivist cultural norms shape the adoption of technologies that emphasize communal benefits and organizational harmony [64]. Additionally, the country's leading position in digital transformation fosters a progressive environment for discussing advanced digital infrastructure [65]. Economically, the interplay between large conglomerates and dynamic SMEs creates diverse viewpoints on how digital transformation can drive business growth and innovation [66].…”

Central-Local Government Relations in Regional Planning and Budgeting in Indonesia: Between Autonomy and Control

“…The purpose of the adoption and utilization of technology by the government for organizational change is to encourage a more productive flow of information beyond the application of new technology (Chung et al, 2022). The application of government technology in many countries is closely related to efforts to increase government accountability as a democratic, trustworthy, and transparent governance mechanism with citizens (Harun et al, 2020).…”

Government Attention, Market Competition and Firm Digital Transformation

“…Government actions also affect enterprise digital transformation, and digital government innovation in South Korea has been on the national agenda in recent years. The president's leadership determines the success or failure of innovation, and thus, digital governance policies need to remain sustainable [84]. Due to the lack of capital, digital capabilities, and human resources of small service enterprises, there are technical barriers, and the support of government policies and programs is important for enterprise digital transformation [85].…”