2016
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1136448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of different polarimetric target decomposition methods in forest density classification using C band SAR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study region is mostly dominated by a series of hill ranges with forest coverage up to 75%. This is in line with the other previous studies which suggested that the four-component decomposition scheme comprising the scattering contributions from surface (single-bounce), double-bounce, volume, and helix performed better than the three-component decomposition scheme [23,59]. Notably, Varghese et al [21] adopted six decomposition methods (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study region is mostly dominated by a series of hill ranges with forest coverage up to 75%. This is in line with the other previous studies which suggested that the four-component decomposition scheme comprising the scattering contributions from surface (single-bounce), double-bounce, volume, and helix performed better than the three-component decomposition scheme [23,59]. Notably, Varghese et al [21] adopted six decomposition methods (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…SVM classifier discriminates the classes by fitting an optimal separating hyperplane to the training samples in a multi-dimensional feature space [58]. It uses kernel function to make nonlinear decision boundaries into linear ones in a high-dimensional space [58,59]. In this study, the SVM classification was performed using Pol-SARpro 5.0 software, wherein two decomposition images (FDD and YD) were used as an input data to classifier.…”
Section: Support Vector Machine (Svm) Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the YH polarimetric decomposition classified by the RF algorithm showed the best results in terms of OA and Kappa index for most of the thematic classes, including forest degradation class, in both years. In this context, Varghese et al [32] analyzed different polarimetric decompositions to classify forest canopy density, based on the full polarimetric RADARSAT-2 data classified by the SVM algorithm. YH decomposition also showed the best results, followed by VZ, FD, and CP decompositions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensors are almost independent of atmospheric conditions and are sensitive to variations in forest biomass and structure [29,30]. SAR data allow a proper assessment of different LULC classes and forest degradation, especially by fire, even under cloudy conditions, or even under smoke conditions during active fires, as noted in some Amazonia rainforest sites [31,32]. Radar sensors with longer wavelengths, such as the one onboard the Advanced Land Observing Satellite/Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (ALOS/PALSAR) satellite, present higher penetration of transmitted microwave signals into the forest canopy when compared with radar sensors with shorter wavelengths, such as the X-band, TerraSAR/TanDEM-X and Cosmo-SkyMed satellites, or the C-band, RADARSAT-2, and Sentinel-1A/1B satellites [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the radar images, studies have shown that the L-band wavelength has a stronger relationship with stems, whereas the C-band wavelength interacts more with the canopy [76,77]. The RFR and SVR model were developed by using only γ 0 HH , γ 0 HV , γ 0 VV , and γ 0 VH to estimate the volume, and the RFR resulting had moderate accuracy.…”
Section: Radar Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%