Analysis of Difference in Center-of-Pressure Positions Between Experts and Novices During Asymmetric Lifting

Abstract

Although numerous studies have analyzed the relationship between manual material handling (MMH) and the forces acting on the lumbar spine, the difference in the MMH between experts and novices through the analysis of measured data has not been well studied. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the difference in the MMH positions between ten skilled experts working at a freight transport company (Group 1) and five unskilled novices without any experience (Group 2) during asymmetric lifting. All the human subjects performed asymmetric lifting experiments with closed eyes; the experiments involved moving loads (6 and 18 kg) to the left side. Time series data of the vertical ground reaction force were measured, using a Wii Balance Board, and then, the center-of-pressure (CoP) trajectories were calculated. The balance board was used for the measurement, because it was reliable, inexpensive, and portable and provided good repeatability even on rough surfaces, and all the information pertaining to the load and worker under various conditions was captured without any omissions. Under the 18 kg load condition, the CoP positions for Group 2 were located on the same side during left asymmetric lifting; however, those for Group 1 were located on the opposite side during left asymmetric lifting (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$P <0.001$ \end{document}). Furthermore, under the 6 kg load condition, the load weight influenced asymmetric lifting for most subjects of Group 2 such that the CoP positions were located on the opposite side (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document} }{}$P <0.001$ \end{document}). Based on the simulation and electromyography measurement results, we inferred that the difference in the CoP positions between the two different groups could be attributed to the difference in the hip positions. Most skilled experts position their hips in such a way that their CoP trajectories move toward the opposite side during left asymmetric lifting. Although the skillful characteristics of experts may be responsible for the lightening of the burden on the waist during asymmetric lifting, there are still two points that this paper does not clarify: the relationship between the experts’ adjustment of the hip position and the load of the weight, and the influence of an imbalance of the CoP position on the forces acting on the lumbar spine.

Evaluation and Fault Classification for Service Robot during Sit- to-Stand Movement through Center of Mass

“…Jeong et al [15] used a WBB to analyze the difference in manual material handling between experts and rookies at a logistics workplace. Huurnik et al [16], Clark et al [17], and Park and Lee [18] demonstrated the validity and test-retest reliability of the WBB by measuring the CoP position and comparing the data with that from an identical study using a laboratory-grade force plate.…”

Design and Validation of Rule-Based Expert System by Using Kinect V2 for Real-Time Athlete Support

“…As mentioned in the Introduction, the accuracy of the data obtained in the systems examined in other studies was based on either movement similarity or similarity of pose. However, in our study [84][85][86], since differences can occur even at different weights in isotonic movements made with weights in the gym environment, the accuracy of the decisions made by the system was compared with the decisions of the certified coach. For this purpose, the participants were asked to perform DSP and LR exercises for one set of 10 repetitions (50%-90% load, one set of 10 reps), as in [87].…”

An Online Method to Detect and Locate an External Load on the Human Body with Applications in Ergonomics Assessment

“…By disregarding , the number of human model parameters to be identified can be considerably reduced [ 3 ]. are the distribution gains for vGRF which can be calculated from the body configuration [ 28 , 29 ] (N.B. is a necessary condition).…”