Volume 1: Codes and Standards 2008
DOI: 10.1115/pvp2008-61791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Data on Pipe Wall Thinning Phenomena by Fluid Flow in Pressurized Water Reactor Plant

Abstract: In August 2004, a pipe rupture accident occurred at The Kansai Electric Power Company Mihama Unit3. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSME) recognized that it was an urgent problem to settle the rules on Pipe Wall Thinning Management by Fluid Flow. JSME enacted “rules on Pipe Wall Thinning” that stipulates the basic requirements of pipe wall thinning management, considering from these situations. In 2006, JSME enacted the “rules on Pipe Wall Thinning Management for PWR Power Plants” (JSME S NG1-2006, JSME… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, FAC rate for 50 °C with pH 7.0 is nearly the same or rather larger than that of 150 °C with pH 9.2. This would mean that in PWR plant pipeline, FAC susceptibility in condensate demineralizer downstream with temperature around 30 to 50 °C and neutral pH at before pH agent injection point, where wall thickness inspection was not recommended or required in the past (EPRI, 1999, Yamakami, 2008, and deaerator upstream with temperature around 140 to 150 °C and alkaline pH about 9.2 in normal AVT (All Volatile Treatment) condition, known to have large potential of catastrophic pipe rupture (NISA, 2004), is comparable.…”
Section: Average Data In Terms Of Major Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, FAC rate for 50 °C with pH 7.0 is nearly the same or rather larger than that of 150 °C with pH 9.2. This would mean that in PWR plant pipeline, FAC susceptibility in condensate demineralizer downstream with temperature around 30 to 50 °C and neutral pH at before pH agent injection point, where wall thickness inspection was not recommended or required in the past (EPRI, 1999, Yamakami, 2008, and deaerator upstream with temperature around 140 to 150 °C and alkaline pH about 9.2 in normal AVT (All Volatile Treatment) condition, known to have large potential of catastrophic pipe rupture (NISA, 2004), is comparable.…”
Section: Average Data In Terms Of Major Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%