Analysis of cumulative live birth rate outcomes of three controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols in patients with diminished ovarian reserve following laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarial endometrioma: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background:To compare the assisted reproductive outcomes of gonadotropin (Gn)-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, microstimulation, and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) following laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarial endometrioma. Methods:In this retrospective cohort study, 89 patients with DOR who had undergone in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection at the Department of Reproductive Medicine at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2020 were included. According to the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols employed, the patients were divided into GnRH antagonist (38 patients), PPOS (27 patients), and microstimulation (24 patients) groups. The basic data and clinical outcomes of the three groups were compared. The main outcome measure was the cumulative live birth rate. Results:No significant differences in the age of the female patients and their spouses and female patients’ body mass index and basal endocrine levels (follicle-stimulating hormone and oestradiol) were noted among the three groups (P > 0.05). The GnRH antagonist group had higher antral follicle counts, greater endometrial thickness on the human chorionic Gn injection day, greater number of oocytes retrieved, and higher two pronuclear embryo counts than did the other two groups. However, the starting dosage of Gn was lower in the GnRH antagonist group than in the other two groups. The microstimulation group had a significantly higher oocyte output rate and high-quality embryo rate than did the other two groups (P < 0.05). No significant differences in the total dosage of Gn, cumulative pregnancy rate, cumulative live birth rate, viable embryo rate, and blastocyst formation rate were observed among the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: For patients aged under 40 years who experienced DOR following laparoscopic cystectomy of ovarial endometrioma, the clinical outcomes of the three controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols were similar. However, the cumulative live birth rate was higher in the GnRH antagonist and PPOS groups than in the microstimulation group.