2019
DOI: 10.2478/sgem-2019-0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of crack propagation in a “pull-out” test

Abstract: The article describes a computer analysis of the pull-out test used to calculate the force needed to pull out a rock fragment and determine the shape of this broken fragment. The analyzed material is sandstone and porphyry. The analysis included the first approach to using own subroutine in the Simulia Abaqus system, that is, which task is undertaken to accurately determine the crack path of the Finite Element Method model. The work also contains a description of laboratory tests and analytical considerations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analyzed study, an anchor was used that was blocked by the wings at the end of the anchor and not by the side surface. The crack simulation in this study has been extensively described in the literature [ 19 , 20 ]. Figure 12 a shows the anchor prepared for mounting, and Figure 12 b shows a used anchor with folded wings.…”
Section: Laboratory and “In Situ” Tests To Verify The Implemented Subroutinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analyzed study, an anchor was used that was blocked by the wings at the end of the anchor and not by the side surface. The crack simulation in this study has been extensively described in the literature [ 19 , 20 ]. Figure 12 a shows the anchor prepared for mounting, and Figure 12 b shows a used anchor with folded wings.…”
Section: Laboratory and “In Situ” Tests To Verify The Implemented Subroutinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three-point bending test on the notched beam structures is another alternative to study the mechanical performance of UHPC-PVA structures under flexure loading [ 9 , 11 ]. Critical stress intensity factor, tensile strength and fracture energy can be estimated from the test results [ 16 , 17 ]. Although the test method is visual and useful, it has its limitation in consuming a lot of material resources and time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the method used to simulate the problem, the material behavior needs to be reproduced reliably in order to ensure that the results are correct and comparable to actual data. Therefore, a constitutive model that captures damage, cracking and other physical and mechanical properties as comprehensively as possible is needed [15, 34,35]. Several models are available for the response of brittle materials, especially rock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%