2011
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.48.1025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Core Physics Experiments on Fresh and Irradiated PWR UO2 Fuels in the REBUS Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffusion calculation gives overestimation of about 20%. This trend is similar to that in the other cores of the REBUS program [16]. It is mainly attributed to the accuracy in the calculation of neutron leakage of the diffusion calculation especially in the axial direction to the dry lattice.…”
Section: Analysis Results Of Core Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The diffusion calculation gives overestimation of about 20%. This trend is similar to that in the other cores of the REBUS program [16]. It is mainly attributed to the accuracy in the calculation of neutron leakage of the diffusion calculation especially in the axial direction to the dry lattice.…”
Section: Analysis Results Of Core Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The diffusion calculations with JENDL-3.2 underestimate the k eff' s of the irradiated MOX core by 1.0%Dk. This underestimation is also seen in the other cores in the REBUS program, which were loaded with irradiated fuel bundles and similar critical water levels of around 80 cm [6,16]. It is attributed to a transport effect unique to experimental cores of a small effective core volume.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Calculationmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the measurement data of the institutes A, B, and A were referred for the MOX, UO 2 -M, and UO 2 -L samples, respectively. This is because (1) the present authors have many experiences to analyze the isotopic composition data of the institute A [3,[9][10][11] for samples taken from MOX and UO 2 fuel assemblies and confirmed the characteristics of the measured data, (2) the institute B adopted a similar measurement technique to the institute A such as mass spectrometry, and (3) the data of the institute C often showed different trends from those of the other institutes.…”
Section: Isotopic Composition Measurements On Pwr Fuel In Malibu Programsupporting
confidence: 67%