1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-7997(99)00015-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of convergence and accuracy of the DRBEM for axisymmetric Helmholtz-type equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea is to use a three-dimensional particular solution and integrate it with respect to () from 0 to 21r. This method has been explored in [6] for the Helmholtz equation. in that case, Uj is expressed by an integral.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea is to use a three-dimensional particular solution and integrate it with respect to () from 0 to 21r. This method has been explored in [6] for the Helmholtz equation. in that case, Uj is expressed by an integral.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], the author has numerically shown the local property of ¢>jo This is important when the function to be interpolated varies steeply over the domain.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee, et al [7] used the DRBEM to model the acoustic radiation in a subsonic non-uniform flow field, and indicated that the Sommerfeld-radiation condition at infinite was satisfied when DRBEM was used to deal with this problem. Perrey-Debain [8] applied the DRBEM to calculate the sound field in the straight ducts with uniform flow. However, the application of DRBEM to predict the acoustic attenuation performance of silencers with three-dimensional complex flow has not been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work the dual reciprocity method [1] is used to solve axisymmetric problems. The DRM has been used previously for axisymmetric problems, see for example [2,3,4]. The difference in this case is that the Laplace fundamental solution is used instead of the one for axisymmetric problems expressed in terms of Eliptic integrals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%