2006
DOI: 10.1049/ip-com:20045176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of connectivity for sensor networks using geometrical probability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the nodes located close to the physical boundaries of the network have a limited coverage area, they have a greater probability of isolation. Therefore, the boundary effects play an important role in determining the overall network connectivity.Different approaches have been used in the literature, to try to model the boundary effects including (i) using geometrical probability [28] and dividing the square region into smaller subregions to facilitate asymptotic analysis of the transmission range for k-connectivity [9], [22] and to find mean node degree in different subregions [29], (ii) using a cluster expansion approach and decomposing the boundary effects into corners and edges to yield high density approximations [27] and (iii) using a deterministic grid deployment of nodes in a finite area [30] to approximate the boundary effects with random deployment of nodes [25]. The above approaches provide bounds, rather than exact results, for the probability of node isolation and/or probability of connectivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the nodes located close to the physical boundaries of the network have a limited coverage area, they have a greater probability of isolation. Therefore, the boundary effects play an important role in determining the overall network connectivity.Different approaches have been used in the literature, to try to model the boundary effects including (i) using geometrical probability [28] and dividing the square region into smaller subregions to facilitate asymptotic analysis of the transmission range for k-connectivity [9], [22] and to find mean node degree in different subregions [29], (ii) using a cluster expansion approach and decomposing the boundary effects into corners and edges to yield high density approximations [27] and (iii) using a deterministic grid deployment of nodes in a finite area [30] to approximate the boundary effects with random deployment of nodes [25]. The above approaches provide bounds, rather than exact results, for the probability of node isolation and/or probability of connectivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with K 1 independent of the transmit power P T . Correction terms to (6) can be shown to be O( min(C,1) ) but are omitted for the sake of brevity. Note that for m = n = 1 it follows that M i ≈ ω η(℘β) C Γ(C).…”
Section: Connectivity Mass and Scaling Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The nodes are able to regulate their transition power nodes according to their distance to the desired recipient. This is essential to ensure the network integrity [9].…”
Section: System and Model Energymentioning
confidence: 99%