1982
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1982.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of competitive ability among genotypes of perennial ryegrass

Abstract: The mean yield in grams of dry matter per plant was measured under two cutting regimes, frequent (F) and infrequent (R). The results could not be fitted adequately by linear regression of the mean yield (y) on the number of plants omitted or substituted (x). Curvilinear regression lines of the form y = a + bx2 or y = a + b1x + b2x2 were successful in fitting the data, but they led to unacceptable predictions when they were extended from substitution experiments, where x is negative, to addition experiments in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ascendancy of regression models to describe competitive interactions is primarily due to their popularity with many agricultural experimentalists (Breese and Hill, 1973;Mather and Caligari, 1981;Mather, Hill and Caligari, 1982 Baan-Hofman and Ennik, 1982; Vernon and Parker, 1983;Spitters and van den Bergh, 1982), or with the use of competitive mixing of different crops or cultivars to stabilise or improve the total yield (Chowdury and Hodgson, 1982;Spitters, 1983b;Salter et a!., 1985;Mead and Riley, 1981). These experiments generally differ both in design and analysis with the weed-crop interactions conforming more to an addition type design and the mixed cropping experiments usually being more suited to a substitution design analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ascendancy of regression models to describe competitive interactions is primarily due to their popularity with many agricultural experimentalists (Breese and Hill, 1973;Mather and Caligari, 1981;Mather, Hill and Caligari, 1982 Baan-Hofman and Ennik, 1982; Vernon and Parker, 1983;Spitters and van den Bergh, 1982), or with the use of competitive mixing of different crops or cultivars to stabilise or improve the total yield (Chowdury and Hodgson, 1982;Spitters, 1983b;Salter et a!., 1985;Mead and Riley, 1981). These experiments generally differ both in design and analysis with the weed-crop interactions conforming more to an addition type design and the mixed cropping experiments usually being more suited to a substitution design analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other component is exploitation and this refers to the acquisition of some necessary and limited resource, for example food or light, by the competing individuals. Exploitation has long been a subject of investigation in D. melanogaster (Bakker, 1961;Mather and Caligari, 1981;de Miranda and Eggleston, 1987) and also in other organisms, for example Lolium perenne (Mather, Hill and Caligari, 1982). Interference has also been investigated in Drosophila although usually in the context of the competition between different species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distinction between aggression and response was drawn by Breese and Hill (1973) and the analytical procedure was refined by Mather and Caligari (1983). Subsequently, this model for the analysis of competitive interactions (although developed using Drosophila melanogaster as a model system) has been applied to a range of experimental and commercial material including Lolium perenne (Mather, Hill and Caligari, 1982) and Hordeum vulgare (Powell, Caligari and Thomas, 1985). In addition, the flexibility of this multiple linear regression approach has been demonstrated through a variety of experimental designs, including both substitution and addition techniques (de Miranda and Eggleston, 1987) and with a variety of competitive characters (Eggleston, 1987;Powell et a!., 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%