2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference &Amp; Exposition 2014
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2014.6939562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of communication schemes for Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameters of the 4-bus microgrid are listed in Table I and II. The latency in the microgrid network can be addressed in following aspects: (1) latency from system status change and the response of the measurement, which may vary from 0.035 to 1.038s according to IEEE Standard C37.118.1™ if PMU serves as the measuring device; (2) latency from data processing, which may occurs on both sender and receiver sides, and may include algorithm processing, data compression, data encryption, etc., which usually costs 0.1 to 0.3s [28]; (3) latency from information traveling between the sender and the receiver within communication networks which is around 0.3s normally [29]. In conclusion, a reasonable approximation of the total latency in the secondary control is from 0.5s to 2.5s [30].…”
Section: Fig 3 An Exemplary 4-bus Microgridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters of the 4-bus microgrid are listed in Table I and II. The latency in the microgrid network can be addressed in following aspects: (1) latency from system status change and the response of the measurement, which may vary from 0.035 to 1.038s according to IEEE Standard C37.118.1™ if PMU serves as the measuring device; (2) latency from data processing, which may occurs on both sender and receiver sides, and may include algorithm processing, data compression, data encryption, etc., which usually costs 0.1 to 0.3s [28]; (3) latency from information traveling between the sender and the receiver within communication networks which is around 0.3s normally [29]. In conclusion, a reasonable approximation of the total latency in the secondary control is from 0.5s to 2.5s [30].…”
Section: Fig 3 An Exemplary 4-bus Microgridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, forecasting of load at lower voltage level is rarely conducted due to the lack of highquality data. Fortunately, the massive deployment of smart meters creates the opportunities to forecast and analyze customer consumption at a much lower level with much higher granularity [14]. By aggregating individual smart meter readings, loads at different aggregation levels can be obtained and analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is almost impossible to tap a signal being sent on a fiber without physically cutting it because the fibers have no effect of electro-magnetic fields. Also, because of non-conductivity, cables are almost passive to any kinds of interferences [21].…”
Section: Advantages Of Ofcmentioning
confidence: 99%