1983
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500010041x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Combined Experiments1

Abstract: Most field experiments are conducted over two or more locations or years, yet statistical references do not contain sufficient detail for complete analysis. The purpose of this paper is to provide a reference for analysis of combined experiments. Tables include sources of variation, degrees of freedom, and F‐ratios for one factor and split‐plot experiments combined over locations and/or years. The F‐ratios are given for fixed, mixed, and random models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
513
1
13

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 858 publications
(527 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
513
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…F-ratios were used to test effects for randomized complete block experimental design (McIntosh 1983). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F-ratios were used to test effects for randomized complete block experimental design (McIntosh 1983). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of variance was performed on data of each year. Combined analysis, with years considered fixed, was conducted as described by McIntosh (12). An overall LSD (compares between treatments at each sampling time and within treatments among sampling times) was calculated from error B in the split plot design and was included on each figure to give a general indication oftreatment difference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All annual bluegrass control data were subjected to statistical analysis using R software (version 3.2.3). Expected means squares of McIntosh (1983) determined that data could be combined over years prior to being subjected to analysis of variance using the 'ExpDes' package in R. Means were separated using Fisher's least significant difference test at α = 0.05 when appropriate. All data and analysis files are available at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2066319.v5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%