2019
DOI: 10.17306/j.afs.0619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of coffee adulterated with roasted corn and roasted soybean using voltammetric electronic tongue

Abstract: Background. Coffee samples adulterated with roasted corn and roasted soybean were analyzed using a voltammetric electronic tongue equipped with a polypyrrole sensor array. Materials and methods. Coffee samples were adulterated in concentrations of 2%, 5%, 10% and 20% of roasted corn and roasted soybean; 5 replicates of each were used. The discrimination capacity of a voltammetric electronic tongue elaborated with a polypyrrole sensor array, was evaluated by principal component analysis and cluster analysis, wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches are based on using multiple voltammetric signals and an advanced chemometric treatment to integrate the chemical information. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] The first approach to quantify the DA levels in urine utilized a chemometric model (artificial neural network (ANN) [44] ) that was developed by using synthetic buffered samples containing DA, UA, and NE. The utilized ANN model resulted in a root mean square error (RMSE) value of 1.15 µm, a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.97, a LoD value of 4.2 µm, and a limit of quantification (LoQ) value of 13.9 µm; this indicates the feasibility of developing a chemometric model from synthetic samples and utilizing the model to predict DA levels in urine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are based on using multiple voltammetric signals and an advanced chemometric treatment to integrate the chemical information. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] The first approach to quantify the DA levels in urine utilized a chemometric model (artificial neural network (ANN) [44] ) that was developed by using synthetic buffered samples containing DA, UA, and NE. The utilized ANN model resulted in a root mean square error (RMSE) value of 1.15 µm, a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.97, a LoD value of 4.2 µm, and a limit of quantification (LoQ) value of 13.9 µm; this indicates the feasibility of developing a chemometric model from synthetic samples and utilizing the model to predict DA levels in urine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They achieved sample discrimination using an electronic tongue equipped with a polypyrrole sensor array, followed by either PCA or cluster analysis. The method was also successfully applied for quantitative analysis by partial least squares regression (Arrieta, Arrieta, and Mendoza 2019;de Morais et al 2019).…”
Section: Voltammetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other forms of adulteration involve the addition of both corn and soybean. Such cases were studied by Arrieta et al and Daniel et al [10,11], who deployed the voltametric electronic tongue and capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. Although efficient (R 2 of 0.973 and 0.941 for the prediction of corn and soybean in case of etongue), these techniques demand high levels of technicity and relatively lengthy processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%