Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2021.111410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of codon usage bias in mitochondrial CO gene among platyhelminthes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in synonymous codons is mainly reflected in the difference in the third codon. In this study, we found that all core PCGs of Amanita species tend to end with A/T, which is consistent with the rule of mitochondrial codon usage in many eukaryotes ( Mazumder et al, 2021 ; Montana-Lozano et al, 2023 ). Most high-frequency codons parsed by RSCU also end with A/T, which further proves the tendency of using the third codon of Amanita .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The difference in synonymous codons is mainly reflected in the difference in the third codon. In this study, we found that all core PCGs of Amanita species tend to end with A/T, which is consistent with the rule of mitochondrial codon usage in many eukaryotes ( Mazumder et al, 2021 ; Montana-Lozano et al, 2023 ). Most high-frequency codons parsed by RSCU also end with A/T, which further proves the tendency of using the third codon of Amanita .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The majority of the differences in codon usage were observed at the third codon. It was also noted that the core PCGs of Ganoderma species typically terminate with A/T, which is consistent with the mitochondrial codon usage pattern observed in some other eukaryotes ( Mazumder et al, 2021 ; Montana-Lozano et al, 2022 ). Additionally, there was a disparity in base usage between different species and genes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%