1986
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(86)90028-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of chromosome aberrations in lymphocytes of long-term heavy smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the groups, the DNA damage parameters showed a slight increase with increasing age (ANOVA p > 0.05). Smoking has been shown to increase DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations in welders (Littlefield and Joiner, 1986;Sellappa et al, 2011;Suresh et al, 2011;Tawn and Whitehouse, 2001). But in our study, only the smoking controls showed a significant increase in the mean CTL as compared to the nonsmoking controls.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Within the groups, the DNA damage parameters showed a slight increase with increasing age (ANOVA p > 0.05). Smoking has been shown to increase DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations in welders (Littlefield and Joiner, 1986;Sellappa et al, 2011;Suresh et al, 2011;Tawn and Whitehouse, 2001). But in our study, only the smoking controls showed a significant increase in the mean CTL as compared to the nonsmoking controls.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…A similar increase was reported by Korte, Wagner, and Obe (1981) in smoke-treated Chinese hamsters. Littlefield and Joiner (1986), however, recorded a significant increase in the mean MI in cultured lymphocytes of cigarette smokers. This was further confirmed by the present authors in the case of hookah smokers (Yadav & Thakur, 2000), where the MI increased significantly from 3.88 in non-smokers to 5.41 in smokers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, the mutagenicity of tobacco smoke has been a matter of controversy. Whereas some authors reported a smoke-related increase in chromosomal aberrations (CA; Littlefield & Joiner, 1986;Obe, Heller, & Vogt, 1984;Obe & Herha, 1978;Obe, Vogt, Madle, Fahning, & Heller, 1982;Vijayaluxmi & Evans, 1982), others did not find one (Bender, Preston, Leonard, Pyatt, Gooch, & Shelby, 1988;Bender, Preston, Leonard, Pyatt, & Gooch, 1989;Husgafvel-Pursiainen, Maki-Paakkanen, Norppa, & Sorsa, 1980;Nordenson, Beckman, Beckman, & Nordstrom, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Pitarque et al (2002) reported significantly higher mean frequencies of SCE per cell and HFC in smokers compared to non-smokers based on a study of shoe factory workers. A higher frequency of chromatid exchanges (CE) among smokers has been reported (Obe & Herha 1978, Vijayalaxmi & Evans 1982, Stenstrand 1985, Littlefield & Joiner 1986; 1/294, 1/458 3/1000, 1/428 CE respectively). We did not observe any chromatid exchanges, maybe because only 100 cells each were scored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We did not observe any chromatid exchanges, maybe because only 100 cells each were scored. Littlefield and Joiner (1986) observed that the majority of chromatid exchanges were symmetrical and apparently involved homologous chromosomes. These quadriradial configurations are analogous to SCE, since the former result from interchromosomal exchanges while the latter involve intrachromosomal exchanges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%