2006
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0606406103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of cartilage matrix fixed charge density and three-dimensional morphology via contrast-enhanced microcomputed tomography

Abstract: Small animal models of osteoarthritis are often used for evaluating the efficacy of pharmacologic treatments and cartilage repair strategies, but noninvasive techniques capable of monitoring matrix-level changes are limited by the joint size and the low radiopacity of soft tissues. Here we present a technique for the noninvasive imaging of cartilage at micrometer-level resolution based on detecting the equilibrium partitioning of an ionic contrast agent via microcomputed tomography. The approach exploits elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
344
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(361 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
344
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the µCT experiments, the baseline X-ray attenuation (without the use of a contrast agent) was found to be indifferent for all topographical locations in the medial tibia and between the ACLT and contralateral cartilage. This observation confirmed the difficulty in the detection of a cartilage lesion without the contrast agent, because of the low attenuation of X-rays in soft tissues (34,41). It should be noted that the baseline attenuation in CT could measure some other properties of cartilage (e.g., cartilage thickness) and the bone structure (e.g., porosity, bone mineral density) (31,42).…”
Section: Pre-contrast μMri and μCtmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the µCT experiments, the baseline X-ray attenuation (without the use of a contrast agent) was found to be indifferent for all topographical locations in the medial tibia and between the ACLT and contralateral cartilage. This observation confirmed the difficulty in the detection of a cartilage lesion without the contrast agent, because of the low attenuation of X-rays in soft tissues (34,41). It should be noted that the baseline attenuation in CT could measure some other properties of cartilage (e.g., cartilage thickness) and the bone structure (e.g., porosity, bone mineral density) (31,42).…”
Section: Pre-contrast μMri and μCtmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The reduction of T1 can be correlated with the Gd concentration in cartilage, which is inversely proportional to the GAG concentration in cartilage (26)(27)(28)(29)(30) with human CT scanners, can measure a number of changes in cartilage and bone, including the tissue volume, X-ray attenuation, and bone mineral density (31)(32)(33). The use of a negatively charged contrast agent ioxaglate enables µCT to measure the GAG concentration in cartilage (34)(35)(36). Similar to the use of Gd in MRI, the negatively charged ioxaglate ions distribute inversely proportional to the GAG molecules in cartilage, which can be used to calculate the GAG concentration.…”
Section: Imaging In Oa Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although normally when the cartilage structure was quantified using micro-CT, the process involved complex staining techniques with radiopaque agents [38][39][40], in the present study the scan conditions have been adjusted to achieve a correct cartilage visualisation without contrast agents and it was enough to be able to quantify its morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the quality of the repair tissue between the 2-mm and 4-mm deep groups, a noncontrast-enhanced micro-CT scan (lCT) and an equilibrium partitioning of an ionic contrast agent (EPIC) through lCT (EPIC-lCT) scan were acquired of each entire talus using a lCT scanner (Skyscan1076; Skyscan, Kontich, Belgium) [30,49] before histologic analysis. The EPIC-lCT was acquired after the tali had been saturated for 24 hours in a 40% Hexabrix 360 dilution (Guebet BV, Gorinchem, The Netherlands) [49].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%