2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of caesarean rate, indications and complications: review from medical college Ambala, Haryana, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Average annual CSR in the present study can be compared with the other studies (Table 8). [7][8][9][10]12,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The indications of caesarean section in the present study can be compared with the following studies ( Table 9). 7,20,[24][25][26][27]33 …”
Section: The Caesarean Section Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Average annual CSR in the present study can be compared with the other studies (Table 8). [7][8][9][10]12,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The indications of caesarean section in the present study can be compared with the following studies ( Table 9). 7,20,[24][25][26][27]33 …”
Section: The Caesarean Section Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Average annual CSR in the present study can be compared with the other studies (Table 8). [7][8][9][10]12,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Yadav S et al stated that 32.9% were elective and 67.1% had emergency LSCS. 8 Mussart N et al found out at a teaching hospital at Faisalabad that 58% had emergency and 42% had elective caesarean section and 34% had previous caesarean section. 9 Amongst the different indications of caesarean section, common once were cephalo-pelvic disproportion and foetal distress.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Yadav S et al noted non-progress of labour in 6.1% of cases undergoing LSCS. 8 Mussart N et al found that in 5% cases failure of progress of labour was the indication. 9 In this study, 14 (2.8%) cases had previous 2 caesarean sections leading to repeat caesarean in our study.…”
Section: Totalmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation