2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of BWR long-term station blackout accident using TRAC-BF1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Provided that this check would have been made earlier, the operators could have recognized the conditions where RCIC was operating, have expected the inevitable trip of RCIC, and then have aligned alternative water injection earlier. According to the analytical results, it is highly likely that the core would have been avoided from damaging if the reactor depressurization and subsequent alternative water injection would have been executed within 13,000 sec (approximately 3.6 h) after RCIC tripped [16]. This implies that the operators would have had time to take actions needed for avoiding core damage.…”
Section: Continuous Operation Of Reactor Core Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided that this check would have been made earlier, the operators could have recognized the conditions where RCIC was operating, have expected the inevitable trip of RCIC, and then have aligned alternative water injection earlier. According to the analytical results, it is highly likely that the core would have been avoided from damaging if the reactor depressurization and subsequent alternative water injection would have been executed within 13,000 sec (approximately 3.6 h) after RCIC tripped [16]. This implies that the operators would have had time to take actions needed for avoiding core damage.…”
Section: Continuous Operation Of Reactor Core Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, it is expected that heat sink is sufficient, but due to RCS inventory loss sooner or later the core will uncover. With some exceptions, like Fukushima unit 2 accident simulation [8], most of the simulations described in Section 1 rely on power from batteries, including simulations performed for selected PWR dealing with extension of station blackout coping capability [12]. This means that equipment was available during first four to eight hours of the transient only (depending on station blackout coping time), which leads to early core damage.…”
Section: Station Blackout Accidentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such it is very appropriate to simulate 2 Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations long-term sequences with core cooling available. Another example of long-term SBO is study [8], in which BWR longterm SBO accident was analyzed using TRAC-BF1 system code. The reactor core isolation cooling system was actuated in the unit 2 reactor and a stable thermal-hydraulic condition was maintained for about three days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the loss of the RHR during shutdown in dierent plants, has been simulated using best-estimate codes such as RELAP-5 (Hassan and Raja , 1993), (Hassan and Banerjee , 1994), (Ferng and Ma , 1996), , , CATHARE (Hassan and Troshko , 1997), TRAC-BF1 (Watanabe et al , 2012).…”
Section: In Order To Improve the Spent Fuel Pools Safety Analysis Itmentioning
confidence: 99%