2003
DOI: 10.13182/nt03-a3415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Burnup and Economic Potential of Alternative Fuel Materials in Thermal Reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, low thermal conductivity also results in higher center-line temperatures leading to faster fuel degradation and thermo-mechanical cracking. A few critical properties of UO 2 and other alternative uranium based fuels are given in Table 2 [25][26][27][28]. Increasing the thermal conductivity by as little as 5% or 10% would provide significant benefits in terms of lowered volume-averaged fuel temperature, fission gas release, and fuel rod internal pressure [29].…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Enhancement In Oxide Based Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, low thermal conductivity also results in higher center-line temperatures leading to faster fuel degradation and thermo-mechanical cracking. A few critical properties of UO 2 and other alternative uranium based fuels are given in Table 2 [25][26][27][28]. Increasing the thermal conductivity by as little as 5% or 10% would provide significant benefits in terms of lowered volume-averaged fuel temperature, fission gas release, and fuel rod internal pressure [29].…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Enhancement In Oxide Based Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%