2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of barley contamination in oats using R5 and ω-gliadin antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another explanation can be the more efficient extraction method used in the sandwich ELISA, which may have been more effective in dissolving prolamins from freeze-dried sourdough matrix. In general, the competitive ELISA is deemed to be the most suitable method to accurately quantify hydrolysed gluten and the sandwich R5 ELISA particularly overestimates prolamins from barley (Kanerva et al, 2006;Thompson and Méndez, 2008). In other words, the digests of wheat and rye but not barley, made by a combined action of endogenous enzymes and AN-PEP enzyme, are believed to meet the "glutenfree" labelling requirement and, thus, adding such malt hydrolysates to gluten-free recipes would keep the prolamin levels of the final products below the Codex gluten-free thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation can be the more efficient extraction method used in the sandwich ELISA, which may have been more effective in dissolving prolamins from freeze-dried sourdough matrix. In general, the competitive ELISA is deemed to be the most suitable method to accurately quantify hydrolysed gluten and the sandwich R5 ELISA particularly overestimates prolamins from barley (Kanerva et al, 2006;Thompson and Méndez, 2008). In other words, the digests of wheat and rye but not barley, made by a combined action of endogenous enzymes and AN-PEP enzyme, are believed to meet the "glutenfree" labelling requirement and, thus, adding such malt hydrolysates to gluten-free recipes would keep the prolamin levels of the final products below the Codex gluten-free thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…buckwheat, maize, and oats. Gluten analysis methods are based on the characteristics of wheat prolamins and, therefore, it has been questioned how accurate are the results obtained for products containing barley or rye (Kanerva et al 2006). The total extraction of prolamins of each cereal species must be well known to obtain reliable analysis results for products containing any of the cereals that are harmful for people with celiac disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be because of lack of sensitive and reliable diagnostic tests and of suitable clinical trials. Even probable contamination of oat with other cereals may occur in the field, during transportation, storage, milling or food processing (Kanerva et al 2006). Owing to this, oats were primarily excluded from gluten free diet.…”
Section: Other Usesmentioning
confidence: 99%