Proceedings of IGARSS '93 - IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.1993.322642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of backscattering from snow covers on Arctic and Antarctic sea ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of backscattering form Arctic and Antarctic sea ice can be properly modeled by adopting a rough multilayer structure. The structure here considered is composed of an upper layer representing a dry snow cover, a middle layer (sea ice), and the lower half space is homogeneous water [ 35 , 36 ]. Specifically, the considered vertical profile is characterized by the following parameters: ε 0 = 1.0, ε 1 = 1.65 + j 0.064, ε 2 = 3.38 + j 0.15, ε 3 = 60.43 + j 40.5; Δ 1 = 0.07 [m], Δ 2 = 0.2 [m].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of backscattering form Arctic and Antarctic sea ice can be properly modeled by adopting a rough multilayer structure. The structure here considered is composed of an upper layer representing a dry snow cover, a middle layer (sea ice), and the lower half space is homogeneous water [ 35 , 36 ]. Specifically, the considered vertical profile is characterized by the following parameters: ε 0 = 1.0, ε 1 = 1.65 + j 0.064, ε 2 = 3.38 + j 0.15, ε 3 = 60.43 + j 40.5; Δ 1 = 0.07 [m], Δ 2 = 0.2 [m].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to systematically show how the perturbative model can be successfully applied to several situations of interest for microwave remote sensing, since it provides a rationale to understand the basic scattering properties of natural rough multilayers, in particular when lower frequency bands are used, for which interface roughness satisfies validity limits of the perturbative approach. In order to do this, we apply the developed perturbation theory to fractal interfaces and, at variance with what we presented in [ 33 ], we here consider actually existing natural structures [ 34 , 35 , 36 ], representative of two classes of natural stratifications: wet paleosoil covered by a low-loss dry sand layer and a sea-ice layer above water with dry snow cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terrain in the Antarctic can be more complex, for example the presence of snow cover on top of the sea ice. Therefore, a model that caters for multiple layers may be able to more accurately represent the sea ice terrain [13][14][15]. Besides this, the sea ice had previously been treated as a sparse medium in the models developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ice shelf area, this is modeled as a thick layer of compacted snow. As discussed in [4,5], due to the wicking up effect of the brine in the sea ice layer, an effective dielectric constant higher than the derived value from the measured data in the layer is used. The thickness is taken to be an average of 600m near Ross Island area, from British Antarctica Survey BEDMAP website [6].…”
Section: Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured grain radius of snow is in the range of 0.5mm to 1.5mm in Antarctica. Value of 1.1mm is chosen considering that snow grain radius in Antarctica is generally large [4]. The parameter d, in Tables I and II is the average distance among the scatterers used in the expression of the Dense Medium Phase and Amplitude Correction Factor.…”
Section: Model Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%