2001
DOI: 10.1134/1.1378167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of anisotropy of cosmic rays with the energy of about 1017 eV by Yakutsk EAS array data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with an analysis of more than 135,000 showers of the Yakutsk array with energies from 3 × 10 16 to 3 × 10 17 eV [88], which finds a dipole amplitude that is compatible with full isotropy.…”
Section: Large Scale Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is in agreement with an analysis of more than 135,000 showers of the Yakutsk array with energies from 3 × 10 16 to 3 × 10 17 eV [88], which finds a dipole amplitude that is compatible with full isotropy.…”
Section: Large Scale Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Constraints on the anisotropy of arrival directions in the range were set using harmonic analysis [32][33][34] and the South-North method [35]. The stringent upper limit for the first harmonic amplitude was 0.1% at a primary energy of 7 × 10 14 eV and 1.25% at around E ≈ 1 EeV.…”
Section: A Measured Zenith Angle Distributions and Those Expected Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the energy region above 10 18 eV, the observed distribution of arrival directions is in agreement with isotropic expectation, in harmony with previous results [10,35], while in the interval (10 17 , 10 18 ) eV there is an explicit deviation from isotropy. Pravdin et al [32] revealed that the effect is a result of irregular observation conditions and seasonal variations of the EAS event rate. More detailed analysis is required to distinguish a real anisotropy of astrophysical origin from seasonal and observational artifacts.…”
Section: A Comparing Measured and Expected Arrival Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficiency of array detection is affected by weather, shutdowns of detectors, the geomagnetic modulation of the EAS event rate, and so on (Ivanov et al 1999(Ivanov et al , 2007Pravdin et al 2001). Attenuation of showers in the atmosphere results in a deviation from the "isotropic" zenith angle distribution, f i , at low energies.…”
Section: Exposure Of the Ground Eas Array For Celestial Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%