Animal Contests 2013
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139051248.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of animal contest data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of fighting typically focus either on differences in physical or physiological RHP traits [15] or on uncorrelated asymmetries between opponents that are determined by the specific context of the fight, such as resource value (RV) [16] or the effect of prior ownership of the resource [17]. It seems obvious that larger individuals should be likely to defeat smaller ones [18,19], but differences in size can be further broken down into differences in weapon size [20,21] and strength [3,22]. Strength is an example of a performance capacity and overall stamina has also been revealed as an important performance capacity that can increase the chances of victory [23].…”
Section: (A) What Makes a Good Fighter?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of fighting typically focus either on differences in physical or physiological RHP traits [15] or on uncorrelated asymmetries between opponents that are determined by the specific context of the fight, such as resource value (RV) [16] or the effect of prior ownership of the resource [17]. It seems obvious that larger individuals should be likely to defeat smaller ones [18,19], but differences in size can be further broken down into differences in weapon size [20,21] and strength [3,22]. Strength is an example of a performance capacity and overall stamina has also been revealed as an important performance capacity that can increase the chances of victory [23].…”
Section: (A) What Makes a Good Fighter?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two major predictors of contest outcomes are the competitive ability of individuals (resource holding potential, RHP) and the value (V) that contestants place on possession of the resource (Maynard Smith and Parker, 1976;Kokko, 2013): each of these may be affected by the nutritional status of the contestants. For example, individuals that have been well fed may be able to persist for longer during contests (RHP) due to their enhanced energy reserves (Poole, 1989;Kemp and Alcock, 2003;Martinez-Lendech et al, 2007;Briffa et al, 2013b) while individuals with depleted reserves may compete more intensely for a contested resource, due to placing a higher value (V) on its exploitation (Riechert, 1998). Further, the availability of macronutrients (protein, fats and carbohydrates) may promote dominance-related behaviours (Davidson, 1997) while other metabolites may physiologically constrain contest behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the availability of macronutrients (protein, fats and carbohydrates) may promote dominance-related behaviours (Davidson, 1997) while other metabolites may physiologically constrain contest behaviour. For instance, in hermit crabs and other crustaceans, metabolites related to energy reserves (glycogen and glucose) and aerobic capacity (lactic acid) as well as hormones (biogenic amines) influence contestant motivation and contest duration (Briffa and Sneddon, 2007;Briffa et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same statistical approach was applied to investigate whether the ratio of contests that involved larger females and smaller defenders or challengers, or those that involved smaller females and larger defenders or challengers deviated from 1:1. Binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate whether female size and the relative difference between the size of males affected contest outcome (win or lose; following Briffa et al 2013).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%