2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2019.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of ancient DNA from South American rhea bones: Implications for zooarchaeology and biogeography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…En Mendoza, la problemática específica de la presencia de aves en contextos arqueológicos fue abordada en el sur de la provincia (Abbona et al, 2019;Giardina, 2006Giardina, , 2010entre otros). Estos trabajos ofrecieron respuestas al tipo de dieta y a la forma de explotación del recurso animal que llevaron a cabo las sociedades cazadoras-recolectoras.…”
Section: Reconocimiento De Aves En El Registro Arqueológico Del Coaunclassified
“…En Mendoza, la problemática específica de la presencia de aves en contextos arqueológicos fue abordada en el sur de la provincia (Abbona et al, 2019;Giardina, 2006Giardina, , 2010entre otros). Estos trabajos ofrecieron respuestas al tipo de dieta y a la forma de explotación del recurso animal que llevaron a cabo las sociedades cazadoras-recolectoras.…”
Section: Reconocimiento De Aves En El Registro Arqueológico Del Coaunclassified
“…Very few parallels exist interrogating the population dynamics of extant wild species (but see e.g. Abbona et al, 2019;Heino et al 2019) although the archaeological record would be a fantastic reservoir of genomic data to improve our understanding of long-term population dynamics, in particular for endangered species (e.g. Fordham et al, 2020).…”
Section: Answering Zooarchaeological Questions Through Adnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though morphometry has many advantages, researchers recognize the limitations of the approach, especially for making inferences concerning past geographic range extension based on small sample sizes [38,[59][60][61][62]. In contrast, analysis of ancient mitochondrial DNA (aDNA) generated from zooarchaeological samples can provide a stronger approach for species identification including population-level comparisons in current and archaeological contexts when species identification is less conclusive based on morphology [63][64][65][66][67]. Analysis of DNA from domestic and wild species can also help delineate domestication events [68][69][70].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%