2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12591-012-0131-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of an Oscillatory Painlevé–Klein Apparatus with a Nonholonomic Constraint

Abstract: In dynamics, both the concepts of rigid body and Coulomb's law of friction are well established, although it is known at least since Painlevé's time that they may lead to irregularities and contradictions, such as loss of uniqueness or existence of the solution of the equations of motion. The problem is still of very actual interest, since it can be of practical significance also for the industrially used rigid body codes. One of the simplest mechanical systems in which these difficulties can be well described… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is less in the literature on the Painlevé paradox occurring in problems with multiple contacts. The Russian literature tends to use as the canonical model, not the CPP but the so-called Painlevé-Klein problem, see [32,52,88,24,3]. A good summary discussion of work on this problem is given in Figure 7: (Adapted from [85]).…”
Section: Other Mechanical Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is less in the literature on the Painlevé paradox occurring in problems with multiple contacts. The Russian literature tends to use as the canonical model, not the CPP but the so-called Painlevé-Klein problem, see [32,52,88,24,3]. A good summary discussion of work on this problem is given in Figure 7: (Adapted from [85]).…”
Section: Other Mechanical Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the implementation of the nonholonomic constraint, that coefficient is taken to be very large (or even infinite). For discussion and resolution of these highly complex issues of contact dynamics, see [14,15,16,17]. Our mechanical system is substantially more complex than the one considered by Painlevé, and thus careful treatment of the dynamics' continuation through detachment is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%