2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-013-2830-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of an automated background correction method for cardiovascular MR phase contrast imaging in children and young adults

Abstract: Our data suggest that background phase correction of phase contrast MRI data does not significantly change Qp:Qs quantification, and there are residual errors in expected Qp:Qs quantification despite background phase correction. However the use of background phase correction does improve quantification of MPA flow relative to combined RPA and LPA flow. Further work is needed to validate these findings in other patient populations, using other MRI units, and across vendors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, automated background correction was assessed in a heterogeneous population of patients referred for phase contrast MRI, including 15 TOF patients. Background correction improved the quantification of flow in these patients [ 17 ]. However, clinical implications for a homogenous cohort of patients were lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, automated background correction was assessed in a heterogeneous population of patients referred for phase contrast MRI, including 15 TOF patients. Background correction improved the quantification of flow in these patients [ 17 ]. However, clinical implications for a homogenous cohort of patients were lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially for congenital heart diseases this phantom correction may therefore be time-consuming, because clinical assessment of these patients generally include multiple phase contrast sequences. Therefore, post-processing image correction, based on phase offset elimination across regions of signal from static tissues, has been developed [ 15 17 ]. This automated background correction method is promising, yet the clinical consequences are unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q s is typically assessed from an additional 2D PC measurement through the ascending aorta with minimal time delay to the pulmonary flow measurement. 29 Employing velocity offset corrections for both measurements, normal Q p  :  Q s ratios of 1.0 ± 0.1, 37 1.05 ± 0.07 71 and 0.98 ± 0.11 72 are reported. Current guidelines 2 recommend PC imaging-based assessment of Q p  :  Q s to exclude atrial septal defects and/or anomalous pulmonary venous return in the diagnostic work-up of patients with PH.…”
Section: Standard Pc Parameters Of the Main Pulmonary Artery In Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These errors, which manifest as phase shifts on a regional, global, and temporal basis, will compromise the ability to accurately quantify integrated parameters such as stroke volume 231-234 . A number of studies have investigated various correction approaches 57,234-236 ; however, there is no widespread agreement as to a universal correction protocol. The lack of standardised analysis tools for regional flow quantification and analysis of PC data with three-directional velocity encoding and/or 3D volumetric coverage is currently a major hurdle for their more widespread clinical application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%