2021
DOI: 10.4103/wjnm.wjnm_50_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of amyloid and tau deposition in Alzheimer's disease using 11C-Pittsburgh compound B and 18F-THK 5351 positron emission tomography imaging

Abstract: This study aims to determine the deposition of 11 C-Pittsburgh compound B ( 11 C-PiB) and 18 F-THK 5351 using a normal database of the optimal cut-off-points for standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Sixteen AD patients and 24 cognitively normal individuals were enrolled in this study. The optimal cutoff points for the SUVR from the normal database were used for quantitative analysis. P-mod software wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two hundred eighty‐seven articles were excluded through the filter at the official PubMed website, and 1420 articles were further excluded by reading the titles and abstracts. After carefully reading the full text and supplementary materials and judging the accuracy and reliability of the extracted data, the final number of articles included in our study was 48 (Beach et al., 2014; Brück et al., 2013; Camus et al., 2012; Clark et al., 2012; Fleisher, 2011; Hatashita & Yamasaki, 2013; Hatashita et al., 2014; Hosokawa et al., 2015; Jack et al., 2012; Kaneko et al., 2014; Kerbage et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Mattsson et al., 2014; Mikhno et al., 2012; Newberg et al., 2012; Ng et al., 2007; Rabinovici et al., 2011; Saint‐Aubert et al., 2014; Tolboom et al., 2010; Trzepacz et al., 2014; Tzen et al., 2014; Vandenberghe et al., 2010; Villemagne et al., 2011, 2019; Alvarez et al., 2018; Ben Bouallegue et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2016; Dukart et al., 2016; Iaccarino et al., 2017; La Joie et al., 2019; Mielke et al., 2018; Oliveira et al., 2018; Ottoy et al., 2019; Park et al., 2019; Schreiber et al., 2015; Seo et al., 2017; Takahashi et al., 2017; Villeneuve et al., 2015; Wang, Chen, et al., 2016; Wang, Yi, et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017; Zwan et al., 2016, 2021; Chanisa et al., 2021; Kitajima et al., 2021; Lesman‐Segev et al., 2021; Peretti et al., 2019). The specific process of literature screening is detailed in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two hundred eighty‐seven articles were excluded through the filter at the official PubMed website, and 1420 articles were further excluded by reading the titles and abstracts. After carefully reading the full text and supplementary materials and judging the accuracy and reliability of the extracted data, the final number of articles included in our study was 48 (Beach et al., 2014; Brück et al., 2013; Camus et al., 2012; Clark et al., 2012; Fleisher, 2011; Hatashita & Yamasaki, 2013; Hatashita et al., 2014; Hosokawa et al., 2015; Jack et al., 2012; Kaneko et al., 2014; Kerbage et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Mattsson et al., 2014; Mikhno et al., 2012; Newberg et al., 2012; Ng et al., 2007; Rabinovici et al., 2011; Saint‐Aubert et al., 2014; Tolboom et al., 2010; Trzepacz et al., 2014; Tzen et al., 2014; Vandenberghe et al., 2010; Villemagne et al., 2011, 2019; Alvarez et al., 2018; Ben Bouallegue et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2016; Dukart et al., 2016; Iaccarino et al., 2017; La Joie et al., 2019; Mielke et al., 2018; Oliveira et al., 2018; Ottoy et al., 2019; Park et al., 2019; Schreiber et al., 2015; Seo et al., 2017; Takahashi et al., 2017; Villeneuve et al., 2015; Wang, Chen, et al., 2016; Wang, Yi, et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017; Zwan et al., 2016, 2021; Chanisa et al., 2021; Kitajima et al., 2021; Lesman‐Segev et al., 2021; Peretti et al., 2019). The specific process of literature screening is detailed in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In quantitative analysis, the average global cortical SUVR threshold ranged from 1.2 to 1.5, but setting the global SUVR threshold higher than 1.4 was thought to miss many AD patients (Villeneuve et al, 2015). Chanisa et al (2021) mentioned that Aβ plaques tend to spread from the cerebral cortex to the cingulate and precuneus regions, whereas they also found the highest 11 C-PIB deposition in the anterior and posterior cingulate gyri. His study showed that making a diagnosis based on local SUVR achieved higher sensitivity and specificity than global SUVR, and that the cutoff values of regional SUVR (1.46-1.81) were higher than global.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the use of 18 F-THK5351 in the clinic still can provide information about tauopathies onset and development, helping to discriminate from other non-tau-related neurological disorders. In fact, 18 F-THK5351 is successfully used to diagnose AD when used in combination with other biomarkers such as automated brain volumetry on MRI [39] or 11 C-Pittsburgh compound B [40]. Additionally, a combination of tau tracers may be best for identifying the disease process underlying tauopathies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed [ 11 C]PiB cut-off for regional SUVR was approximately 1.46-1.81 in their study yielded sensitivity ranging from 81.25% to 93.75%, and specificity of 100% (CI 0.82-1.00). 64 Another study on the additional diagnostic value of molecular imaging using [ 11 C]PiB amyloid PET together with [ 18 F] FDG metabolic PET and [ 18 F]THK5351 Tau PET on the diagnosis of dementia subtypes found primary diagnosis change in 60% of patients and the combined PET scan information was able to solve 95.2% pre-PET diagnostic dilemmas. 65 To the best of our knowledge, the clinical performance of [ 18 F]Florbetaben PET scan at The National Cyclotron and PET Centre has not been published yet.…”
Section: Clinical and Research Applications At The National Cyclotron...mentioning
confidence: 99%