2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of adsorption tests of gases emitted in the coal self-heating process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest volumes of propylene were sorbed on coal samples 6 and 7, characterized by the lowest porosity and low micropore surface area (see Table 2). The grade of metamorphism [25][26][27], porosity, and chemical characteristics of coal surface [10,11] are the most important properties of coals in terms of their sorption characteristics. The increase in the grade of metamorphism and decrease in coal porosity resulted in the deterioration of sorption capacity of tested coals with respect to propylene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest volumes of propylene were sorbed on coal samples 6 and 7, characterized by the lowest porosity and low micropore surface area (see Table 2). The grade of metamorphism [25][26][27], porosity, and chemical characteristics of coal surface [10,11] are the most important properties of coals in terms of their sorption characteristics. The increase in the grade of metamorphism and decrease in coal porosity resulted in the deterioration of sorption capacity of tested coals with respect to propylene.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in turn causes the underestimation of the concentrations of gaseous indicators of the self-heating process and an incorrect assessment of the development of this process. The gases adsorbed on coal in the highest amounts include the unsaturated hydrocarbons-such as ethylene, propylene, and acetylene-which reduces their applicability in the assessment of the self-heating process progress [9][10][11]. This is particularly important in the case of coals with high sorption capacity, and with long distances between the self-heating center and the measurement point of concentrations of gaseous process indicators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krzysztof Stanczyk et al [13] applied the underground coal gasification technique at temperatures above 700 o C to produce a hydrogen-rich gas. Li et al [14] conducted open-system non-isothermal pyrolysis experiments on selected immature and mature carbonaceous coals and found considerable amounts of H 2 being released at temperatures up to 1200 o C. However generation mechanism and release rule responsible for H2 generation at low temperature(T<200 oC) have not been fully conducted and elucidated because of its low release content, ease of leaking, and difficult of monitoring Agnieszka Dudzińska [15] analyzed the absorbency of hard coals with respect to different gases (i.e., carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, ethylene, and propylene) with hydrogen and carbon dioxide being the least and the most absorbed gases, respectively. Grossman [16][17][18] conducted a series of studies on molecular hydrogen evolution during low-temperature coal oxidation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exception was sample 2 with grain size at the range of 0.25 to 0.50 mm, for which propylene and ethylene were absorbed in an equal amount, however, smaller than propane while the sorption value of propane was higher. The experimental results obtained in the sorption test as regards single gases on coals with the grain size of 0.5 to 0.7 mm demonstrated a higher sorption capacity of ethylene than propylene and saturated hydrocarbons . The reason for the higher amount of sorbed propylene in comparison with ethylene is that during the flow of the multicomponent mixture, a competitive adsorption process takes place.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%