2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of acoustic emissions recorded during a mine-by experiment in an underground research laboratory in clay shales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the location of our test which is roughly in the middle of the Opalinus Clay layer, the greatest uncertainty is the magnitude of σ 3 which appears low compared to the pore pressure of about 2 MPa measured away from the galleries excavation damage zone. For these reasons, other authors recently re-estimated σ 3 to higher values of 2.5-to-2.9 MPa (Amann et al 2018). In addition, the hydraulic tests allowed for a good estimate of the stress magnitude normal to the bedding, estimated to be 4.2 MPa.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Stress Tensor Estimations At Mont Terrimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the location of our test which is roughly in the middle of the Opalinus Clay layer, the greatest uncertainty is the magnitude of σ 3 which appears low compared to the pore pressure of about 2 MPa measured away from the galleries excavation damage zone. For these reasons, other authors recently re-estimated σ 3 to higher values of 2.5-to-2.9 MPa (Amann et al 2018). In addition, the hydraulic tests allowed for a good estimate of the stress magnitude normal to the bedding, estimated to be 4.2 MPa.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Stress Tensor Estimations At Mont Terrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fracture pressure value is significantly larger than the fault opening pressure of 5.43 MPa. Another reason for the lack of a vertical fracture intersecting the bedding planes and or the faultparallel-to-bedding is that several authors (Amann et al ;Thoeny 2014) showed that tensile and cohesive strengths of such structures are dramatically low, respectively ∼0.5 and 0.6 MPa, which make these planes much weaker than the intact rock.…”
Section: Effect Of Heterogeneity On Hydraulic Based Stress Measuremenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Comparing to the measured stress data from the site [24,25], the orientation of the stress used in the model is slightly rotated by 5 degrees for the two horizontal components (see Fig. 13a).…”
Section: Step1 -Fm1 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2. Fault orientation and stress tensor of Mont Terri data [24,25], data used in a recent study [26] and data estimated in this study. Further development is needed to improve the model behavior.…”
Section: Step1 -Fm1 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest uncertainty is the magnitude of σ 3 , which appears low compared to the pore pressure of about 2 MPa measured away from the excavation damage zone of the galleries. For these reasons, other authors recently reestimated σ 3 and reported higher values of 2.5-to-2.9 MPa (Amann et al, 2018). In addition, the hydraulic tests allowed for a good estimate of the stress magnitude normal to the bedding planes, estimated to be 4.2 MPa.…”
Section: Tectonic Setting: Geological Structures Stress Conditions mentioning
confidence: 99%