2021
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1916238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of accidents caused by human factors in the oil and gas industry using the HFACS-OGI framework

Abstract: Objectives. Human factors have been identified as the most common causes of catastrophic accidents in the oil and gas industry. Therefore, this study aims to analyze human causal factors of accidents in the oil and gas industry using the human factors analysis and classification system for the oil and gas industry (HFACS-OGI) framework. Methods. This study involved quantitative data collection for 184 accident cases in the oil and gas industry that occurred from 2013 to 2017 from the International Association … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accident network topology is similar to the one for refineries and all oil & gas CIs combined. Quantified by a globally comprehensive data source, our results confirm the existing literature that most accidents are due to human errors [ 38 , 40 – 42 ] but also that fire, explosion, and toxic release are the major hazards in the industry [ 43 , 44 ], as well as the main sources for further domino effects [ 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accident network topology is similar to the one for refineries and all oil & gas CIs combined. Quantified by a globally comprehensive data source, our results confirm the existing literature that most accidents are due to human errors [ 38 , 40 – 42 ] but also that fire, explosion, and toxic release are the major hazards in the industry [ 43 , 44 ], as well as the main sources for further domino effects [ 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Several terms were also shortened to improve graph readability: ’Spill / Release / Leakage’ to Release (which can be toxic and/or inflammable), ’Rupture / Crack / Break Up’ to Rupture, ’Overflow / Overfitting / Overload’ to Overload, ’Asphyxiation / Gas Poisoning / Suffocating’ to Gas Poisoning, ’Sprayed / Sprinkled / Wetted’ to Sprayed, and ’Crushed / Pushed / Pinned’ to Crushed. It should be noted that ENSAD does not provide detailed causal factors for human errors, in contrast to the ones provided in the HFACS-OGI framework [ 38 ]. This is due to the lack of information retrievable for some accidents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Level 5 9 (11%) [5] 30 (6%) [5] -Level 4 34 (43%) [1] 192 (40%) [1] 391 (25%) [3] Level 3 11 (14%) [3] 129 (27%) [2] 270 (17%) [4] Level 2 16 (20%) [2] 66 (14%) [3] 466 (30%) [1] Level 1 10 (13%) [4] 66 (14%) [3] 416 (27%) [2] Number of contributing factor 80 483 1543…”
Section: Hfacs Ogi Ogapi Csmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1979, a nuclear meltdown caused by a nuclear accident at the Three Miles Island resulted in the evacuation of 100,000 residents 3 . The Piper Alpha accident in 1988 killed 167 people 4 . An explosion at a BP Texas City refinery in 2005 killed 15 people and injured 180 people 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is especially relevant for the long-term operation of wells. The human factor has been identified as the most common cause of catastrophic accidents in the oil and gas industry [4]. However, there are threats that are relatively independent of human impact, for example, the destruction of casing strings due to landslides [5,6] or the collapse of deep wells built in unstable formations such as mudstones, bischofites, shales and layers of plastic mineral salt [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%