2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of abietic acid and dehydroabietic acid in food samples by in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have already developed an in-tube SPME method, coupled with HPLC [32,33] and LC-MS [34][35][36], for determination of various compounds in food samples. The details of the in-tube SPME technique and its applications have been summarized in some reviews [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have already developed an in-tube SPME method, coupled with HPLC [32,33] and LC-MS [34][35][36], for determination of various compounds in food samples. The details of the in-tube SPME technique and its applications have been summarized in some reviews [37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intra-day and inter-day precisions were found to be within 1.29-2.56% and 1.89-2.84%, respectively. In comparison with previous reports [4,[29][30][31][32][33], this method provided more accurate and precise determination for the two resin acids AA and DHAA. Table 2 Linearity, reproducibility of retention time and peak area (n = 6), limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of analyte concentration (LOAC) for determination of abietic acid (AA) and dehydroabietic acid (DHAA) with fluorescence detection.…”
Section: Accuracy and Precisionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Though pre-concentration can lower the detection limits, AA and DHAA are usually present in complex matrixes and thus the interferences components will be also concentrated together. In this case, multi-step manual operations such as solid-phase extraction (SPE) [4,29,30,32] or solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [33] are usually required, otherwise it will be difficult to both avoid interferences [32] and lower detection limits [4]. However, multi-step operations are tedious, time-consuming, and more seriously, tend to cause high errors to labile analytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, a Supel-Q porous layer open tubular capillary column is used for in-tube solid phase microextraction. 9,10 From the viewpoints of its high specific surface area and ease of preparation, gold nanoparticle (GNP) is an attractive material for the inner wall modification. Recently, dodecanethiol-capped GNPs were immobilized on the inner wall of a silica capillary tube and were used as the stationary phase for gas chromatography [11][12][13] or open tubular electrochromatography [14][15][16] columns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%