2013
DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation mechanism in the North China Plain

Abstract: A regional haze episode occurred in the Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei province (BTH) area in the North China Plain (NCP) from 16 to 19 January 2010. Data were collected and analyzed during the time frame of 14 through 23 January 2010 to include the haze event. The increase of secondary inorganic pollutants (SO42−, NO3, NH4+) in PM2.5 was observed simultaneously at four sites, especially in the plain area of the BTH, which co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
296
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 591 publications
(323 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
18
296
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, urban area only takes up approximately 5% area in China while cropland is the dominant surface type also featuring dense population and high PM2.5 exposure (Liu, 2005;Xu et al, 2011). Frequent regional-scale haze pollution and cropland-dominant land cover in China make 15 it necessary to figure out this interaction over rural area Zhao et al, 2013b). The differences in surface parameters between cities and rural area are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Dome Effect Over Urban And Rural Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, urban area only takes up approximately 5% area in China while cropland is the dominant surface type also featuring dense population and high PM2.5 exposure (Liu, 2005;Xu et al, 2011). Frequent regional-scale haze pollution and cropland-dominant land cover in China make 15 it necessary to figure out this interaction over rural area Zhao et al, 2013b). The differences in surface parameters between cities and rural area are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: A Comparison Of the Dome Effect Over Urban And Rural Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to particle precipitation and wall loss, the concentration of particles inside the chamber dropped gradually. Simultaneous measurements with the sensors, the SidePak, and the SMPS started when the mass concentration given by the SidePak was below 1 mg/m 3 , which is slightly above the typical PM concentrations in highly polluted cities (Tiwari et al 2013;Zhao et al 2013;Guo et al 2014). The whole process took approximately 2.5 h (Figure 2b), which was close to the gravitational precipitation time for a 1 mm (aerodynamic size) particle to drop from the top to the bottom of the chamber (»2.4 h).…”
Section: Chamber For Particle Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indicated by the R 2 values calculated by the least-square regression (Figures 4a, b, d, e, g, and h). Given the low cost of these particle sensors, it will be worthwhile to apply these sensors to obtain local and real-time PM concentrations in polluted cities, where the daily upper limit of particle concentrations is around 600 mg/m 3 , and the hourly upper limit of particle concentrations is higher than 1 mg/m 3 (Tiwari et al 2013;Zhao et al 2013;Guo et al 2014). Among the three sensors, the GP2Y sensor gave the highest linearity with an R 2 value of 0.9838 for sensors of the same type on four sides of the chamber wall in one measurement, and 0.9831 for the same sensor on one side of the chamber wall in several measurements.…”
Section: Linearity Of Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfate formation in aqueous solution is generated by the uptake of SO 2 onto wet, pre-existing particles or cloud droplets followed by oxidation by O 3 , H 2 O 2, NO 2 or O 2 catalyzed by Fe(III) and Mn(II) (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006;Wang et al, 2012). Previous studies found that sulfate is produced mainly by heterogeneous reactions by oxidizing SO 2 on wet, pre-existing particles or cloud droplets under high relative humidity (RH) conditions in haze episode in winter Li et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2012;Zhao et al, 2013). Both laboratory experiments and in situ observations suggest that the aqueous oxidation of SO 2 is attributed to catalysis by metals, such as iron and manganese (Turšič et al, 2003;Li et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%