1998
DOI: 10.1109/50.669000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a WDM packet switch with improved performance under bursty traffic conditions due to tuneable wavelength converters

Abstract: Abstract-For realistic traffic, i.e., bursty traffic patterns, the use of tuneable wavelength converters is recognized as essential for reducing the complexity of photonic wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) packet switches. Results are obtained from an analytical traffic model that includes buffering in the wavelength domain and accounts for bursty traffic. The theoretical model is verified by simulations and from the model we find that higher traffic loads as well as burstiness can be accepted when tuneab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
54
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Buffering is dimensioned for a negligible packet loss probability. Switch sizes considered are N={2,4} input and output fibers, and n={2, 8,32,64} wavelengths per fiber. Results obtained for higher values of N={6,8}, not included in the paper, do not differ from the ones shown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Buffering is dimensioned for a negligible packet loss probability. Switch sizes considered are N={2,4} input and output fibers, and n={2, 8,32,64} wavelengths per fiber. Results obtained for higher values of N={6,8}, not included in the paper, do not differ from the ones shown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the hardware complexity of the IBWR architecture is much lower than the one for the output buffered proposals. Table I illustrates the cost side of this complexity vs. performance trade-off, for three prominent OPS output buffered architectures: the KEOPS switch [9], the Output-Buffered Wavelength-Routed switch [3] and the space switch [8]. The comparison involves switch fabrics of N input and output fibers, n wavelengths per fiber and M buffer positions.…”
Section: Packet Delay Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several optical switch architectures, along with their buffering schemes, have been proposed in recent years [4] [5] [15] [6] [7] [9]. Packet scheduling in bufferless and buffered optical switches has been studied in the literature, see, for example, [13] and [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, optical buffering is achieved by using optical fiber delay lines (FDL) for packet contention resolution. [1][2][3][4][5] Using FDL, packets are stored in different lengths of delay lines, through which the departing times of packets are time-shifted. Another technique used for resolving packet contention is to introduce wavelength conversion on FDL, where the wavelengths of more than two packets contending the same output port are converted to different wavelengths by using tunable wavelength converters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%