2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2009.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a stochastic SIR epidemic on a random network incorporating household structure

Abstract: This paper is concerned with a stochastic SIR (susceptible → infective → removed) model for the spread of an epidemic amongst a population of individuals, with a random network of social contacts, that is also partitioned into households. The behaviour of the model as the population size tends to infinity in an appropriate fashion is investigated. A threshold parameter which determines whether or not an epidemic with few initial infectives can become established and lead to a major outbreak is obtained, as are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
148
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
148
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both the standard and improved closures, the now-explicit assumption made about clustering is that each transitive link exists with independent probability φ, and so we would expect networks where transitive links are themselves clustered together into cliques as in [1] or unclustered as in [28] where no triangles overlap not to give good dynamical agreement with the proposed closures.…”
Section: Moment Closuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both the standard and improved closures, the now-explicit assumption made about clustering is that each transitive link exists with independent probability φ, and so we would expect networks where transitive links are themselves clustered together into cliques as in [1] or unclustered as in [28] where no triangles overlap not to give good dynamical agreement with the proposed closures.…”
Section: Moment Closuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases the impact of the network structure on the epidemic threshold and final epidemic size is clear. For example, in [2] the final epidemic size is given implicitly by an equation connecting it to moments of the network degree and other factors. The percolation-theory-based approach [17,27] applies even more widely for general transmission and recovery processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, considerable attention has been given to analysing the spread of infection on populations with structure modelled by a random graph (Andersson 1998, Britton et al 2008, including the case where the random graph has a specified degree distribution (Newman 2002, Kenah andRobins 2007). Some of these models have been combined to give, for example, the multitype households model of Ball and Lyne (2001), the model of Ball and Neal (2008) incorporating random networks and homogeneously mixing contacts and the network and households model of Ball et al (2009Ball et al ( , 2010. Other modifications and extensions of random network models are considered by, for example, Trapman (2007), Miller (2009) and Gleeson and Melnik (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%