2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1801.01740
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a micro-macro acceleration method with minimum relative entropy moment matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many possible matching strategies that come with a different choice for I, see [10] for more details. In this work, we will use matching in Kullback-Leibler divergence, or relative entropy, which is based on information-theoretic considerations [26]. The objective is to minimize…”
Section: The Continuous Matching Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There are many possible matching strategies that come with a different choice for I, see [10] for more details. In this work, we will use matching in Kullback-Leibler divergence, or relative entropy, which is based on information-theoretic considerations [26]. The objective is to minimize…”
Section: The Continuous Matching Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we mentioned in the introduction of this Section, a problem arises when the extrapolated macroscopic state variables m n+1 fall outside the domain of the matching operator M. In this case, there is no probability distribution that is consistent with the extrapolated states, and the micro-macro acceleration algorithm fails. We call such behavior a matching failure [10,26]. When the extrapolation step ∆t is smaller, the extrapolated macroscopic state variables will lie closer to the macroscopic state variables of the prior distribution, for which there exists a probability distribution consistent with the prior state variables, namely the prior distribution itself.…”
Section: An Adaptive Time-stepping Strategy For Matching Failuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations