2010
DOI: 10.2478/cmam-2010-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a Class of Penalty Methods for Computing Singular Minimizers

Abstract: -Amongst the more exciting phenomena in the field of nonlinear partial differential equations is the Lavrentiev phenomenon which occurs in the calculus of variations. We prove that a conforming finite element method fails if and only if the Lavrentiev phenomenon is present. Consequently, nonstandard finite element methods have to be designed for the detection of the Lavrentiev phenomenon in the computational calculus of variations. We formulate and analyze a general strategy for solving variational problems in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, we remark that in order to prove the convergence of the finite-element method, it is necessary to have the density of the Lipschitz functions in the space where we are looking for the solution of the state equation. A reciprocate of this result has been obtained in [5] for a calculus of variations problem without restrictions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this sense, we remark that in order to prove the convergence of the finite-element method, it is necessary to have the density of the Lipschitz functions in the space where we are looking for the solution of the state equation. A reciprocate of this result has been obtained in [5] for a calculus of variations problem without restrictions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In particular, one cannot hope for convergence of conformal polynomial finite elements as far as discretization of y concerns, which are always only subspaces of W 1,∞ (Ω; R d ), which was already well recognized for static problems e.g. in [BaL06,CaO10,Li95,Li96]. For quasistatic rate-independent problems as considered here, this difficulty is still present.…”
Section: Numerical Approximationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus we make a penalization/regularization by a parameter ε > 0 of the stored energy similarly as in [CaO10] and also of the global constraints by considering…”
Section: Numerical Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, a more striking property, which was proved by Ball and Knowles (cf. [2]), is that if u j is a sequence of functions in W 1,q (0, 1) for q ≥ 3 2 with u j (0) = 0 and u j (1) = 1 such that u j → u a.e. as j → ∞, then J (u j ) → ∞ as j → ∞.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%