2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of a castable refractory using the wedge splitting test and cohesive zone model

Abstract: A cohesive zone approach is applied to the Wedge Splitting Test (WST) using the finite element code Abaqus to obtain the tensile strength, the fracture energy and insight about the crack wake region. A Finite Element Model Updating (FEMU) method, with a cost function based on the measured load (FEMU-F), is used to calibrate the sought parameters. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) provided the kinematic boundary conditions, and the images were also used to define the geometry for the finite element analysis. Besi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(85 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before performing the calibration itself, sensitivity analyses are very useful to make sure that all the parameters of the selected model are identifiable 16,17,23 . In the present case, the load sensitivities were computed for parameter offsets ɛ = 1 % .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Before performing the calibration itself, sensitivity analyses are very useful to make sure that all the parameters of the selected model are identifiable 16,17,23 . In the present case, the load sensitivities were computed for parameter offsets ɛ = 1 % .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered that CZM parameters for modes I and II are the same since the sensitivity for mode II is very low in the present case. The parameters of the PPR model that defines the curve, that is, the shape parameters ( α and β ) and the initial slope ( λ n and λ t ) were chosen equal to 7 and 0.005, respectively 17 . To illustrate the selected CZM, Figure 13 shows the traction‐separation law using the PPR model with the initial parameters.…”
Section: Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, displacement fields of entire surfaces are measured, and not only the crack mouth opening displacement during fracture tests. The correlation between measured fields and close-form solutions can be used to calibrate fracture mechanics parameters [14,15]. The second advantage enables the technique to be applied to soft materials [16,17] or at high temperatures [6,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%