1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)74610-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of 135 Autopsy Eyes for Ocular Involvement in Leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
68
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Although significant CLL complications have been reported, the lack of consistent association with disease stage or haematological parameters would make targeted screening difficult. 15,16 As the prevalence of complications in this study is low, we do not believe that routine screening for ocular complications is justified.…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 72%
“…5 Although significant CLL complications have been reported, the lack of consistent association with disease stage or haematological parameters would make targeted screening difficult. 15,16 As the prevalence of complications in this study is low, we do not believe that routine screening for ocular complications is justified.…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 72%
“…In contrast, Karesh et al (1987) observed that the number of circulating leucocytes was unrelated to the presence of haemorrhages with or without white centres. The autopsy study by Leonardy et al (1990) showed a highly significant correlation between ocular leukaemic cell infiltration and agonal white blood cell counts; in a number of cases, leukaemic cells were seen migrating in choroidal vessels or infiltrating perivascularly. It is probable that this mechanism may explain the role of a high white blood cell count in the pathogenesis of retinal haemorrhages in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…7 The reported prevalence of ocular involvement in leukaemia ranges from 9% to as high as 90%. 8,9 This divergent variation in results may imply the transient nature of leukemic ocular findings, which may be waxing and waning with time and treatment. It may also be due to the varied study designs and study centres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%