2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12046-020-1301-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis, fabrication and detailed comparative study of surface and interior rotor PMSM prototypes of identical nominal ratings and stators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their saliency ratios are 1 (or close to 1), so these motors do not provide a sufficient reluctance torque component [14]. Additionally, they are not the most suitable candidates for variable-speed applications due to their low field-weakening capabilities [15].…”
Section: Introduction (Gi̇ri̇ş)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their saliency ratios are 1 (or close to 1), so these motors do not provide a sufficient reluctance torque component [14]. Additionally, they are not the most suitable candidates for variable-speed applications due to their low field-weakening capabilities [15].…”
Section: Introduction (Gi̇ri̇ş)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their high-power density and other irreplaceable advantages, the surfacemounted permanent magnet (PM) machines (SMPMM) have been applied in many situations i.e., industrial manufacture, home automation, electro-mobile, robotics, etc. [1][2][3][4][5][6]. At present, people pay much attention to the weakening of the cogging torque, to the reduction in torque ripple, and to the suppression of the vibration or noise of the SMPMM [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenging factors for the design of PMSM are the number of permanent magnets used, shape, size, stator winding topologies, and positioning of permanent magnets [20]. The two basic rotor structures of permanent magnet synchronous motor are (i) Surface mounted permanent magnet synchronous motor (SMPMSM) and (ii) Interior buried magnet permanent magnet synchronous motor (IBPMSM), and a comparative analysis of fractional slot type SMPMSM and IBPMSM in terms of induced EMF, torque, losses, and efficiency are presented in [2], [21][22][23]. Also, the comparison is done based on its size, weight of materials used, and electromagnetic characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%