2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3127163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis Based on Onboard Lamp and Lunar Vicarious Calibrations for Sensitivity Degradation of a Hyperspectral Sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then calculated the ratio of the measured radiance shifted by a wavelength of ω to the modeled radiance, as shown in Fig. 1(b), where the shifted data were obtained using a cubic spline interpolation according to the method used in [28]. For the case of ω = −1.00, −2.00, −4.00, and −5.00 nm, a concave or convex feature in the wavelength range 1240 ≤ λ ≤ 1280 nm is observed in the radiance ratio, indicating that the shape of Band S1 for the measured radiance is not consistent with that for the modeled radiance.…”
Section: Methods a Atmospheric Correction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then calculated the ratio of the measured radiance shifted by a wavelength of ω to the modeled radiance, as shown in Fig. 1(b), where the shifted data were obtained using a cubic spline interpolation according to the method used in [28]. For the case of ω = −1.00, −2.00, −4.00, and −5.00 nm, a concave or convex feature in the wavelength range 1240 ≤ λ ≤ 1280 nm is observed in the radiance ratio, indicating that the shape of Band S1 for the measured radiance is not consistent with that for the modeled radiance.…”
Section: Methods a Atmospheric Correction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Fig. 2(b) also shows the radiance ratio for the case of the measured radiance shifted by ω = +0.4 nm (red circles), where we obtained the shifted data using the cubic spline interpolation (see, e.g., [27]). We see that the radiance ratio around λ = 745-785 nm with ω = +0.4 nm becomes nearly flat as compared to that with ω = 0.0 nm.…”
Section: B Evaluation Of the Spectral Smile By Atmospheric Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%