2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and sizing of thermal energy storage in combined heating, cooling and power plants for buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. [13] focuses on the optimal sizing of a thermal storage for a predetermined CHP system in the residential and tertiary context based on a simulation approach. The study considers a concave function of the investment for the thermal storage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [13] focuses on the optimal sizing of a thermal storage for a predetermined CHP system in the residential and tertiary context based on a simulation approach. The study considers a concave function of the investment for the thermal storage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than utilizing building thermal mass, the operation strategies for TES which are derived by mathematical programming, model predictive control (MPC) and reinforcement learning approaches are demonstrated to outperform the conventional control strategy such as chiller-priority and storage-priority strategies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The near-optimal TES control strategy proposed in [9] is comparable to optimal TES control strategy obtained by dynamic programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These optimal capacities estimated by EPRI represent ratios of energy storage to cooling power of between 3.3 Wh/W and 10 Wh/W, with unit capacities up to 150 kW and 1500 kW h, with the upper end of this spectrum serving schools, public facilities, and medium-sized commercial operations. Sizing of energy storage systems is crucial in order to ensure cost effectiveness, especially for the smallest residential systems [70,77,78]. This paper does not attempt to determine optimal sizing, and relies on this cited literature as a basis of our estimates.…”
Section: End-user System Sizing and Consumer Electricity Savings For mentioning
confidence: 98%