2017
DOI: 10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i12.21931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Results: Confirmatory Factor Analysis the Malay Version of Dreem Inventory With Medical Students of Unisza, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia

Abstract: Objectives:The DREEM inventory has been universally established as a generic instrument to assess health-related educational programs. There were some apprehensions regarding the psychometric properties of the DREEM raised in last few years. This study evaluated first ever the psychometric properties of the Bahasa Melayu version of the DREEM in a sample of Malaysian medical students. Methods:A cross-sectional study was carried and universal sampling method was applied. Researchers selected 1-5 th -year medical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original version of DREEM has 50 items 27 and been translated into various languages, including Malay. 28 - 33 It has five domains: students’ perception of learning (SPoL), students’ perception of teaching (SPoT), students’ academic self-perception (SASP), students’ perception of atmosphere (SPoA), and students’ social self-perception (SSSP). It is internationally accepted as a useful tool to provide feedback on the educational climate in medical institutions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original version of DREEM has 50 items 27 and been translated into various languages, including Malay. 28 - 33 It has five domains: students’ perception of learning (SPoL), students’ perception of teaching (SPoT), students’ academic self-perception (SASP), students’ perception of atmosphere (SPoA), and students’ social self-perception (SSSP). It is internationally accepted as a useful tool to provide feedback on the educational climate in medical institutions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%