2013
DOI: 10.5815/ijitcs.2013.02.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Ranking of Software Reliability Models Based on Weighted Criteria Value

Abstract: Many software reliability growth models (SRGMs) have been analy zed for measuring the growth of software reliability. Selection of optimal SRGMs for use in a particular case has been an area of interest for researchers in the field of software reliability. A ll existing methodologies use same weight for each comparison criterion. But in reality, it is the fact that all the parameters do not have the same prio rity in reliability measurement. Keep ing this point in mind, in this paper, a co mputational methodol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many comparison criteria as defined in [22] wherein the authors have presented analysis and ranking of software reliability models based on weighted criteria. The comparison criteria used is measure also called as coefficient of multiple determinations ( which is usually used to depict the goodness-of-fit and is expressible as: [15] ∑ ∑ ∑ ⁄ represents a measure of the percentage of the total variation about the mean for the fitted curve.…”
Section: Results and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many comparison criteria as defined in [22] wherein the authors have presented analysis and ranking of software reliability models based on weighted criteria. The comparison criteria used is measure also called as coefficient of multiple determinations ( which is usually used to depict the goodness-of-fit and is expressible as: [15] ∑ ∑ ∑ ⁄ represents a measure of the percentage of the total variation about the mean for the fitted curve.…”
Section: Results and Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geol considered that the time between failures are taken to be exponentially distributed. Different enhancements have been proposed to the existing time between failure models .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seventh criterion is the predicted relative variation (PRV), which is called variance [34][35][36]. It means the standard deviation of the prediction bias and is defined as:…”
Section: Of 17mentioning
confidence: 99%