2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icaccs48705.2020.9074183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Prediction of Cardio Vascular Disease using Machine Learning Classifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In research [76], the decision tree's accuracy is better than the random forest, around 1%. Nevertheless, in [86], the random forest's accuracy exceeds around 12% than the decision tree. Researchers in [73] and [80] used an ensemble model, where the accuracy was 98.50% and 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In research [76], the decision tree's accuracy is better than the random forest, around 1%. Nevertheless, in [86], the random forest's accuracy exceeds around 12% than the decision tree. Researchers in [73] and [80] used an ensemble model, where the accuracy was 98.50% and 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In 2020, N. Komal Kumar and et al [86] suggested a model to predicate Cardio Vascular Disease (CVD) disease depend on the machine learning ML classification algorithms like the random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, SVM, and K.N.N. According to the obtained result, the random forest classifier algorithm has higher accuracy than the other classifier algorithm.…”
Section: H Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al [17] calculated various performance metrics like Accuracy, AUC ROC score, and execution time of various classifiers such as RF, DT, LR, SVM, and k-NN. It utilizes a heart disease dataset from the UCI repository and was carried out on Jupyter (Python).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experiment was carried out on R Studio and the result concluded that HRFLM produced better accuracy (88.47%) than other classifiers. [6], [17], [19], [7]- [11], [13], [14], [16] 11 NB [7], [8], [10], [11], [13], [14], [16], [18], [20] 9…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation