2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and optimisation for inerter-based isolators via fixed-point theory and algebraic solution

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the problem of analysis and optimisation of the inerter-based isolators based on a "uni-axial" single-degree-of-freedom isolation system. In the first part, in order to gain an in-depth understanding of inerter from the prospective of vibration, the frequency responses of both parallel-connected and series-connected inerters are analysed. In the second part, three other inerter-based isolators are introduced and the tuning procedures in both the H ∞ optimisation and the H 2 optimis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are mainly two approaches to optimally control the response of a linear system: minimizing the peak modulus of the system's transfer function, which is known as H ∞ optimization, and directly minimizing the system's response, which is known as H 2 optimization. In this study, the H 2 optimization scheme was adopted because of the following: (1) For random excitations such as wind or earthquakes, instead of harmonic excitation, the H 2 optimization scheme would be more practical. (2) The peak modulus of the transfer function does not change smoothly as parameters change; therefore, the H ∞ optimization scheme may cause numerical instability as optimizations in this study would involve numerical approaches.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis Of Oscillator With Pvidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are mainly two approaches to optimally control the response of a linear system: minimizing the peak modulus of the system's transfer function, which is known as H ∞ optimization, and directly minimizing the system's response, which is known as H 2 optimization. In this study, the H 2 optimization scheme was adopted because of the following: (1) For random excitations such as wind or earthquakes, instead of harmonic excitation, the H 2 optimization scheme would be more practical. (2) The peak modulus of the transfer function does not change smoothly as parameters change; therefore, the H ∞ optimization scheme may cause numerical instability as optimizations in this study would involve numerical approaches.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis Of Oscillator With Pvidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, parallel layouts, which are the focus of this study, are completely different from TMDs, and fixed‐point theory may therefore not be applicable to performing the parametric design. Although the fixed‐point theory has been used to the design of a VID with a parallel layout, that is, parallel VID (PVID), the unsuitability of this approach is obvious, as discussed in detail in the following section of this paper. Furthermore, for the fixed‐point method, the inherent damping of the primary structure is neglected, and an empirically equivalent mass ratio must be provided before conducting the parametric design, which is an added limitation of the fixed‐point method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the adaptive‐configuration TMD is a semiactive damper, its performance depends strongly on its control algorithm . Hu et al analytically derived the optimal parameters of different configurations of inerter‐based isolators, including the TVMD and TID, based on an isolated single degree of freedom (SDOF) system with H∞ and H2 optimizations. Wen et al evaluated the performance of tuned inerter‐based dampers, TVMD and TID, for the seismic control of MDOF structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appealing property of inerters is that they can be designed and realized in practice having their inertance significantly larger than their mass [1,2]. This opens many interesting possibilities so that many authors reported on how to design and use inerters to suppress mechanical vibrations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vibration isolation problems it is often necessary to tune the impedance of the isolator elements based on some optimization criteria. This can be done by either minimizing maxima of the response (minimax or H∞ optimization), or by minimizing the energy in the response signals (H2 optimization) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%