1991
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(91)90164-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and occurrence of C26-steranes in petroleum and source rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, from a viewpoint of methyl moieties, an origin from a prokaryotic methylotroph can be used to explain the detected 4-methyl (C 22-23 , C 27-30 ), 4,4-dimethyl steranes (C 22-24 , C 28-30 ) and lanostanes (C 24-25 , C 30 , with 4,4,14-trimethyl moieties) in this study. The C 26 -norcholestanes in our samples most likely originated by bacterially mediated alteration of C 27 sterols, as suggested by Moldowan et al (1991). Low molecular weight C 21 -C 25 steranes and C 22 ÀC 26 methyl steranes were reported in saturated hydrocarbon fractions derived from fermentation of immature organic matter (Ding et al, 2001), which also indicates a bacterial source for the unusual short chain steranes (C 20 -C 26 ) in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, from a viewpoint of methyl moieties, an origin from a prokaryotic methylotroph can be used to explain the detected 4-methyl (C 22-23 , C 27-30 ), 4,4-dimethyl steranes (C 22-24 , C 28-30 ) and lanostanes (C 24-25 , C 30 , with 4,4,14-trimethyl moieties) in this study. The C 26 -norcholestanes in our samples most likely originated by bacterially mediated alteration of C 27 sterols, as suggested by Moldowan et al (1991). Low molecular weight C 21 -C 25 steranes and C 22 ÀC 26 methyl steranes were reported in saturated hydrocarbon fractions derived from fermentation of immature organic matter (Ding et al, 2001), which also indicates a bacterial source for the unusual short chain steranes (C 20 -C 26 ) in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…However, there appear to be more reports of the occurrence of lanosterol in marine and freshwater sponges or other non-photosynthetic organisms (Chaffee et al, 1986). Thus, we consider that the C 24 and C 25 lanostanes in our samples were derived mainly from sponges and/or dinoflagellates, as indicated by the following: (1) In our literature survey (Van Graas et al, 1982;Wolff et al, 1986;Summons et al, 1987;Chen et al, 1989;Moldowan et al, 1991;Volkman et al, 1993;Peters et al, 2005), all reports of long chain steranes (A-nor-steranes, norcholestanes, 4-methyl steranes and lanostanes) and pregnanes refer to a sponge and/or a dinoflagellate source; (2) lanosterol and cycloartenol in some sponges are both transformed to 4,4,14-trimethyl sterols (Kerr et al, 1989), the basic skeleton of lanostanes; (3) although some sponges are incapable of de novo biosynthesis, they can also selectively modify the molecular nucleus to give rise to unique A-nor or 19-nor skeletons (Kerr et al, 1989), hydrocarbon equivalents of which are described as androstane, which is present in our two oil samples; (4) short chain sterols have been more frequently identified in gorgonians and sponges than in dinoflagellates . For example, short side chain sterols of the androstane and pregnane type, and of the 3-hydroxy-pregnan-20-type, were found in sponges (H. flavescens) from the Black Sea (Elenkov et al, 1999); (5) an unusually large number of C 21 and C 22 short chain steranes, counterparts of short chain sterols, and much more abundant in sponges , are distinctly dominant in our samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7: 29Ts/(29Ts + norhopane) (Moldowan et al, 1991); 8: 22S/(22S+22R) of C31 αβ-hopanes (Mackenzie et al, 1980); 9: ββ/(ββ + αα) of C29 (20R+20S) sterane isomers (Mackenzie et al, 1980); 10: 20S/(20S+20R) of C29 sterane isomers (Mackenzie, 1984); 11: diasteranes/(diasteranes + regular steranes) (Peters et al, 2005); 12: C20/(C20+C28) triaromatic steroids (TAS) (Mackenzie et al, 1985); 13: C28TA/(C28TA+C29MA) (Mackenzie et al, 1985); 14: 20: MA(I)/MA(I + II) (Peters et al, 2005); 15: Methyl-phenanthrene ratio (MPR) (Radke et al, 1982b); 16: Methyl phenanthrene index 1 (MPI1) (Radke et al, 1982a); 17: MDR (Radke et al, 1986); 18: Methyl phenanthrene distribution fraction (MPDF) (Kvalheim et al, 1987). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C 31 αβ -hopane 22S/(22S + 22R) ratio values of 0.51-0.64 (Table 3, column 8) suggest that almost all samples are fully isomerised, but this ratio has limited application to maturities beyond the early oil window (Peters et al, 2005). The norneohopane (29Ts) and norhopane (29αβ) ratio 29Ts/(29Ts + 29ab) (Moldowan et al, 1991) varies between 0.19 and 0.59 (Table 3, column 7;Figs. 3,4), showing a relatively wide range as has also been observed on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (cf.…”
Section: Saturated Hydrocarbon Maturity Parametersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These include 24-norcholestanes (Holba et al 1998a, b) Allard et al 2001), long-chain diols, and mid-chain hydroxyl methylalkanoates (Sinninghe Damst6 et al 2003). The secular increase in 24-norcholestane abundance (Moldowan et al 1991;Holba et al 1998a, b) was observed and linked to the diatom radiation well before a precursor sterol was recognized in a culture of the centric diatom Thalassiosira aff. antarctica (Rampen et al 2005).…”
Section: B Biomarkers and The Rise Of Modern Phytoplanktonmentioning
confidence: 97%